- Thread starter
- #141
David Battistella
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2007
- Messages
- 10,003
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 38
It's still got quite a nice quality wide open though, 
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Great shot Vincent. Would love to see an r3d snapshot of that one. That 80mm is a wonderful lens. Mine blooms a bit at 1.4 but such a solid piece of glass!
Battistella
I love the 80mm but on my last job, I made the mistake of shooting some stuff at 1,4 and it doesn't look good at allIt's like if I have added some glow and gaussian blur in post...
Note to myself: never shoot again wide open with that lens!
I learned to treat is as a one-of-a-kind special effect to be used selectively in the right context. Its baked into the image in a way that'd be hard to replicate in post...
a 'dream filter' of sorts![]()
Shooting with these Leica-R lenses is a new thing for me and sharing experiences with all you Guys on that thread definitely helps a lot.
Man this is a lens brand that I know nothing about but the images in this post are amazing!! I have a scarlet X EF mount does anyone know if there is an adapter available for this lens available. What is the difference between the R version and M version of this lens. I seen a couple on ebay and wasn't really sure. Does anyone have any video footage of the Scarlet X with any of these Leica lenses? I really love the quality images of the Summulix 35mm 1.4 and 50 mm version in this post!
When I first used the 80 WO it threw me for a loop. After playing with it for a while I learned to treat is as a one-of-a-kind special effect to be used selectively in the right context. Its baked into the image in a way that'd be hard to replicate in post...
a 'dream filter' of sorts
Very nice 80 lux portrait Vincent
True, I was really surprised at first and probably not in a good way but after reading your comment and thinking more about it, I imagine some compositions which could benefit from that "look".
Thanks for this advice.
Shooting with these Leica-R lenses is a new thing for me and sharing experiences with all you Guys on that thread definitely helps a lot.
Can you two elaborate on when you would use the 80? I have a 90/2 and the 80/1.4 looks absurdly expensive if it blooms wide open and it requires always being used stopped down. The 80 lux has been on my radar a while but I just can't seem to pull the trigger.
It has a dreamy look wide open that i can see working well for creative projects like MVs and such. The look disappears by about f2. Not sure how it compares to the old 90/2 otherwise, but imagine it may be a bit sharper at close range. If you can get your hands on one, the 90/2 apo asph takes micro-contrast to a whole nother level... It has a different look too that I prefer slightly over the 80, but they're both great.
Can you two elaborate on when you would use the 80? I have a 90/2 and the 80/1.4 looks absurdly expensive if it blooms wide open and it requires always being used stopped down. The 80 lux has been on my radar a while but I just can't seem to pull the trigger.
There are two distinct camps on the 90/2 and 80 lux. Some love the 80 while others consider the premium over the 90/2 as not worth it.
I've owned/used both and MUCH prefer the 80.
The 80 Lux is sharp-enough WO and has that famous Mandler (old-school Leica lens designer) 'glow'. Once you stop it down to 2.2-2.8, it gets razor sharp in the center. The 90/2 is nice, has the same Mandler fingerprint but is very soft WO and doesn't get as sharp as the 80 in the center until about 5.6. The 80 is also very flare resistant and very well-corrected for CA/PF.
Both lenses are buttery bokeh.