peter roehsler
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2006
- Messages
- 328
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
I am with you on this 
I own Leica #169 (serial production started with #130).
peter
I own Leica #169 (serial production started with #130).
peter
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Jim,
What's included in your camera collection?
Just curious........
Dave
i own RED 1397. And in terms of history i will not sell it either. It is not an early serial number but it had a huge impact on my life and thats were its value comes from! keep it going.
There is no value in material things, only the soul that drives them...
The ideal of the RED camera is not in the sculpted metal and circuit boards, but in what it inspires people to believe they can achieve. The legacy of the RED ONE will not be in a museum or in someone's collection, but in the life experience, dreams and work of those who were inspired.
Collecting is a very personal thing, I don't collect many cameras but I have a few. The jewell of my collection is a 1960's Leica M4 given to me by the famous Rock and Roll photographer Jim Marshall while I was assisting him. I don't know what photos it may have taken but here are some of his from that era...
No offense to the camera, but if I were OffHollywod Mark I would sell at least one of those cameras for that price. Reasoning: I think Jim is currently the only one who would pay that much for it right now. I'm no collector, so I can't tell you what this camera would be worth in, say 20 years, but unless we're talking the first camera or the first three, it seems there will be a limited number of bidders. In 20 years that same 200k put in the market even with loss protection through something like a market link CD would earn maybe an average of 5% / year conservatively compounded it's going to be worth over 500k (granted inflation could hit but maybe the market hits and you make 10%). And if you were wrong, then you still have the other camera to keep your grand children in college for life all because somehow you got ahead of me in line on that day at NAB... I mean... because you believed in the impossible.
Personally, I grew up on welfare and I own very few things (I don't even have a TV that plays cable, but I do have a RED One, go figure), so it's possible I don't understand the value attrition of rare things.... But for me, I'd take that 200k and invest it into my film projects because I've spent a career earning other people millions and it'd be nice to share in that end. Once I get the epic I don't think I'll be thinking about the RED One much - even after it is becomes MX next week.I will be thinking a lot about the images coming out of the Epic though and how that will change my and other people's lives.
I also own another very early Red, and I have a pretty good idea what its worth.
i own two cameras in the high 1000's. In these times of clabber and vinegar (used to be milk and honey) I could sell one of them for less than I paid for it and it would make an enormous difference in my everyday (material) quality of living. Neither one is for sale. I've grown attached to them both and if I get thrown out on the street, I've got a neat little bag for each of them that makes them easy to carry.