James Brundige
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
- Messages
- 856
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Snowmass, Colorado
- Website
- firstlightfilms.tv
I
I'm not criticizing Ted but just reminding people that not everyone is able to pay for such exotic gear and in some cases, a 7D is better than no camera at all.
DSLRs are totally great. I use them all the time. I gave my 7d to my daughter, and she's making great YouTubes. They are a wonderful tool for students on a budget and pros who need a versatile small camera on projects that can use a highly compressed codec. Horses for courses.
The point is it's not arrogant to point out that the native codec of a $2000 still camera is good for the web, and in a completely different league than Epic, which is being used with $50K lenses to make images to project on a 60 ft. screen.
Compared to ProRes, H264 is ugly. Compared to uncompressed 1080, it's really ugly. A comparison with 5K raw is just silly, as is criticizing Ted for making this simple observation. It has nothing to do with who can afford what.
Thanks for checking in, Jarred. But get some sleep. I know how exhausting the show is. (confession - I used to work the Sony booth - kept me in betacams for years.)