- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #141
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 13,392
- Reaction score
- 796
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Website
- www.phfx.com
I'm thinking/hoping that mechanically, being that these aren't rehoused stills like the Compact Primes or CN-Es, that these will likely compete very well, right? $4k per lens isn't bad, but not amazing like those Zunows were (on paper). Even still, I feel like ACs will choose these of the CP2s if given the option… assuming that the mechanics are peachy (what say you Phil? 300deg focus rotation? Amazing marks?)
Are they planning an 18mm t2.1?
I think that's why peeps are excited about them. Mechanically speaking they are purposed designed for motion use.
These to me will be "more matched" than the CN-E and CP.2 primes as they are being designed as a set with consistent T stops to boot.
An 18mm might happen down the road, but that's after the 25 and 10 mm come out. I think the original plan on the 100 was to make it a macro, don't know if that changed or not.