Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

First Look - Schneider Xenon FF-Prime Lenses

Phil Holland

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
13,392
Reaction score
795
Points
113
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.phfx.com
phfx_SXFFP_01_title.jpg


First Look – Schneider Xenon FF-Prime Lenses

A couple days ago Ryan Avery of Schneider Optics contacted me and informed me that he had a set of prototype Schneider Xenon FF-Prime Lenses. He also asked if I'd like to test them out for a day and mentioned I might be the first to shoot any images with them. Being the lens nut that I am and my new fondness of the Cine-Xenar III lenses I certainly couldn't pass that up. Below are a few of my thoughts regarding the lenses. I only had about 4 hours of shooting and inspection time with them, but I tried to get as much done as possible. Consider this a "quick preview".


Where Did These Come From?

These lenses started their life when they were announced and shown as the Video Xenons, however, much has changed during their product development and these lenses are indeed finally coming to the market at the end of this year as Xenon FF-Primes. Matt Duclos provided a nice preview of these lenses on his blog here. He also was able to put the lenses up on the projector and make some observations about the lenses a couple days ago. I'll add the link right here when his article is up.


Lens Details

The most notable thing about the new Xenon FF-Primes are that they are designed to cover FF35 (36x24mm). That puts them up to compete squarely against Canon CN-E Primes and Zeiss CP.2 Primes. However, the exciting thing about these new Schneider Xenon FF-Primes is that they are not simply based on still lenses. They have been designed from the ground up to be proper cinema glass. As such, they avoid some of the weirdness that isn't exactly desirable that the CN-E, CP.2, and other still lenses capture when used for motion pictures.

The initial set will consist of 35, 50, and 75mm primes with more focal lengths on the way.

Here's the breakdown on the new Schneider Xenon FF-Primes:


  • FF35 Full Frame Coverage (36x24mm)
  • T2.1-22 Iris Range
  • 14 Iris Blades
  • Weighs approximately 3.3lbs each
  • Designed for 4K
  • Color Matched
  • Minimal Breathing
  • Uniform Size and Gear Spacing
  • 300 Degree Focus Pull
  • Generous Focus and Iris Marks
  • No Image Shift
  • 100mm Outer Diamter
  • 95mm Front Threads
  • Available in PL, Canon EOS/EF, and Nikon F Mount
  • Available 4th Quarter 2013
  • MSRP $4000 each

So pretty much with that price point I'd say that these are a potential game changer. Let's take a closer look. Here are my quick impressions of the set:


Build Quality
The very first thing you'll notice when you hold one of these lenses in your hands is that they are very well built. These are not toys, they are tanks. Clearly the Xenon FF-Primes have been designed to stand years production use and abuse. They are very solid and feel like a solid piece of metal and glass. That's great news.

phfx_SXFFP_02_EFMount.jpg


I opted to test out the Canon EOS/EF Mount version to allow me to check out the full frame coverage. The first thing I noticed about the lens mount is just how solid it is. It appears to not suffer from the "wiggle" effect you get from thinner lens mounts like Canon and Nikon lenses. Ryan explained to me that the mount runs deep into the body of the lens.


14 Iris Blades, Bokeh, and Out Of Focus Image

Iris design and blade count are pretty much create that unique look behind the out of focus image behind and in front of your in focus subject. There are 14 blades packed into the Xenon FF-Primes and they create a somewhat consistent shape and feel through the aperture range.

phfx_SXFFP_03_14BladeIris.jpg


This particular design yields a more round/circular bokeh shape, which to me is very pleasing:

phfx_SXFFP_04_bokeh.jpg


phfx_SXFFP_05_bokeh.jpg



Light Falloff/Vignetting Wide Open

Wide open the Xenon FF-Primes produce a fairly flat image without noticeable falloff. This is good news for both Mysterium-X and soon Dragon shooters. I was actually surprised by these results and was expecting more vignetting overall.

phfx_SXFFP_06_lightFalloffFF35.jpg



FF35 Distortion

I wasn't expecting to see much distortion on this set, but I did decide to compare the Xenon FF-Primes to their Canon equivalents to see how they fair against similar competition. The 35mm Xenon FF-Prime has a bit more of a bulge compared to the Canon 35mm f/1.4L, but nothing that I feel would distract from the image. The 50mm and 75mm were fairly flat and looked good to me.


phfx_SXFFP_07_FF35Distortion.jpg



Miscellaneous Optical Notes

One thing I noticed after tinkering with these lenses that I though was very nice was just how nicely color matched they are across the set and apertures. In that respect the Xenon FF-Primes are similar to the Cine-Xenars III. Schneider is certainly putting some effort in quality control to provide consistency across lens sets. Nicely done.


Operational Notes

I ran each lens through about 200 focus pulls each. I also tried configuring the camera in a variety of ways to see if there were any clearance issues or odd roadblocks when working with follow focuses. I was particularly curious about the removable lens support bracket and if it could remain attached during normal LWS operations:

phfx_SXFFP_08_OpNotesLensSupport.jpg


This will be nice to use with lighter cameras or if you are looking to really lock down the lens on your rods. Happily I was able to clear it with the Redrock Follow Focus|blue that I often use:

phfx_SXFFP_09_OpNotesLensSupportClearance.jpg


I was also mimicking some general production workflow and swapping out lenses with and without a matte box. Pretty quickly the consistent size and gear spacing impressed the heck out of me. Lens changes don't require an adjustment of the follow focus position, same goes for users who use swing away matte boxes. That makes these ideal for run and gun or any sort of speedy workflow. This also can help keep your rig compact by using specific sized rods to your Xenon FF-Prime setup and you won't need anything longer or shorter for any reason. Nicely done.

Pulling focus with 300 degrees of rotation is an utter joy for me and ACs will appreciate that as well. I plopped the camera down in front of a bush and as the wind blew the larger leaves around I was able to track them with ease and precision at T2.1. The big difference here against say modified still lenses or just lenses with shorter throws is that you don't have access to that level of precision.

I found that I enjoyed operating with a speed crank attached which enhanced the precision and control even further while allowing more access to "different gears" when you need it. This is how I prefer to use cinema style lenses as well when self operating.

phfx_SXFFP_10_CrankSizeEtc.jpg



Racking Focus and Iris

Here is a very short video I tossed together with some focus racks wide open at T2.1 as well as an iris pull on the 50mm and a couple shots at T4 at the end:


Notice that there's no "jump" from image shift. That's really awesome at the price point that these lenses land in. There is a small amount of breathing, but I would describe this as pretty darn minimal. That's pretty impressive at this price.


General Thoughts on Character

The Schneider Xenon FF-Primes provide nice usable image wide open. The resolving power is decent and in line with mid-range primes across the board. After experimenting for a bit I found that these lenses really sing around T2.8-T4. They have almost a classical feel with the current coatings and flare protection. Overall they render a slightly, very slightly, less contrasty image compared to the Canon primes I compared them too, which added to this classic feel. They are warm, but not warm like Canon K35s. They also have a "glow" about the highlights that's also similar to that classic feel. Which can be quickly wrangled at T2.8 if that's not the look you're after.

Here's some grabs from graded .R3Ds of a sculpture by one of the students at Gnomon, Brandon Love.

phfx_SXFFP_11_T435mmSing.jpg


phfx_SXFFP_11_T450mmSing.jpg


phfx_SXFFP_11_T475mmSing.jpg
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #2
WIP It Into Shape

WIP = Work In Progress. That's exactly what these prototypes are. These were created in Germany to have ready by NAB and get into the hands of folks like Matt and myself to give them a quick once over to see what could be better and what's working out nicely. There's a few things that could stand to be improved on before the final production run in my mind. Improved coating formulas will help wrangle in that fringing/chromatic aberrations you see in the highlights. I'm able to get similar yet not as pronounced CA on the Canons at the equivalent apertures. I was noticing it more on the 35mm and the 75mm.

Additionally, the prototype 75mm was a bit "tight" in the pull. When you watch the focus rack video you'll see a bit of movement on the return pull and that's due to the lens being a bit stiff. That's likely easily remedied via a more viscous grease or moderate cam redesign.

I've used prototype glass before and this is all stuff that can be hammered out before the production run.


Final Thoughts

It's no secret I'm a Red shooter and the Dragon sensor is pretty much around the corner. With it's larger sensor and my fondness for VistaVision/FF35 as a format a lens set like the Schneider Xenon FF-Primes is extremely alluring to me. Also, at this price point and performance level the Xenon FF-Primes are pretty damn hard to beat. I would choose these over the Zeiss CP.2 as the Schneider's feel a bit more solid and are from the ground up designed for cinema use and show it. I'm really hoping to take a look at the final production version in a few months, but I would say purchasing this set is a no brainer.

Down the line, it would be great for Schneider to flesh out the range of the Xenon FF-Primes with additional focal lengths. Currently in this price bracket and range of lenses nobody is really offering a full set with consistent apertures. I imagine we'll see a 25mm first, but an 18 and 100 macro would be impressive to say the least. I'm actually pretty smitten with the 75mm Xenon FF-Prime as is. It's a focal length that's been rather illusive in this range. A bit more punch than a 50mm, yet not as much separation as an 85mm. I've always loved that length and really happy they have included it in this set.

Schneider overall has been impressing me a lot lately. These Xenons fit right in line with what their bigger brother, Cine-Xenar III, is all about. The price to quality ratio on their cinema primes is extremely attractive for owner/operators and rental houses.

phfx_SXFFP_12_35mmXenonOnAStick.jpg
 
Great review. Planning on checking them out at NAB. Hopefully i'll run into you there.
 
Another fantastic review, thanks Phil. I really hope they bring 18mm and 100mm MACRO !
set of 18,25,35,50,75,100 macro and 135 would be fantastic for freelancers .
 
Thanks Phil,

I have been interested in these lenses and following their progress for a while.
I love that there is no "wiggle" on the EF mount. That is precisely what I hate the most about the CP.2's.
They look much more solid as well.
The only thing that concerns me is how long it will take to produce a 24mm and 18mm...

It seems they produce images which are more contrasty than the Xenar III's (and the sets before them).
Can anyone confirm this?

Hope they get rid of the CA though. One of the other things I liked about their big brother sets. Not much of it...

Lastly, wondering what their resolving power (lpi) is. Perhaps Matt Duclos can answer that?
 
Hey Phil. I'm really excited about these lenses. I think the Xenar's are great and look forward to checking these out. Are the mounts interchangeable? That's my biggest question, which I why I have a CP.2 lens kit currently.
 
They are.

Hey Phil. I'm really excited about these lenses. I think the Xenar's are great and look forward to checking these out. Are the mounts interchangeable? That's my biggest question, which I why I have a CP.2 lens kit currently.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #16
Cheers guys. At this price it's sort of an unreal deal compared to what else is out there.


Man, I had my heart set on new Leica Summicrons, but Schneider is bringing it on!

I'm really curious to see how the new Leica Summicon-C lenses stand up to the Schneider Cine-Xenar IIIs. Leica's will be more expensive, but the Cine-Xenar III lenses are here today and pretty damn great.
 
Thank you very much Phil for the detailed review, greatly appreciated! Quick question, what are we looking at in terms of MFD? If they have great close focus abilities like their bigger brothers then I know several entities that would scoop up several sets for MoCo tabletop.

Thanks again Phil!
 
Thank you Phil for the preview and tests. These are yummy... ! they seem to have thought of everything, including the interchangeable mounts...

It's also interesting to see what's better about the Xenar IIIs. From a first look they borrow a lot from their big brothers.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #19
Quick question, what are we looking at in terms of MFD?

Here's the numbers as they stand now:

Minimum Focus Distances:
  • 35mm = 14"
  • 50mm = 1.8'
  • 75mm = 3.3'

What I was noticing pretty quickly that these lenses seemed to be designed with more of a narrative mindset. Meaning that the close focus pretty much produces a full head with a bit of close up coverage.

So not as flexible as the Cine-Xenar III. However! They do indeed have 95mm threaded fronts and 100mm diameter lenses. Meaning you can likely find screw on or clamp on diopters/close up lenses to suite your needs for macro work.


It's also interesting to see what's better about the Xenar IIIs. From a first look they borrow a lot from their big brothers.

The similarites between the Xenon and the Cine-Xenars seems to be the build quality, build consistency (gear distance/lens size), and general optical consistency mindset. Overall, there's a whole lot of differences between the two.

The major ones I can think of off the top of my head are:

  • The Cine-Xenars III lenses are telecentric and do not breath at all during focus racks.
  • The Xenons are about 1lb lighter per lens over the Cine-Xenars.
  • The Xenons are about 1 inch shorter than the Cine-Xenars.
  • The Xenons are designed to cover up to FF35.
  • The Cine-Xenar III; 35mm and up *may* cover Dragon at 6K. They do cover Mysterium-X 5K Full.
  • Focus rotation of the Xenon FF-Primes = 300 degrees, Cine-Xenar III = 270 degrees.
  • Filter threads on the Xenon FF-Primes = 95mm, Cine-Xenar III = 100mm.
  • The Cine-Xenar III flare less and are a bit more contrasty in general compared to the Xenon FF-Primes.
  • The Cine-Xenar III lenses have 18 iris blades, he Xenon FF-Primes have 14. Both provide pretty much perfect circular bokeh from what I can tell.
  • The Cine-Xenar III do indeed provide higher resolving power center frame and across the S35 field.
  • The Xenon FF-Primes are T2.1 throughout the set
  • The Cine-Xenar III primes are T2.2, T2.1, T2.0-22 throughout the set. The variance between T2.2 and T2.0 is 1/3rd of a stop, which is fairly minor.

Besides that the Cine-Xenar IIIs are available and shipping now in a very full range, but are 2X the price of the Xenon FF-Primes.

I need to really do some more shooting with the Cine-Xenar III lenses. I would use them over Ultra Primes considering what I've seen and learned over the last few months. Hoping to get a few days shooting with them shortly after NAB and really put them through their paces.
 
Thanks Phil for the write up!

Was the even field illumination test done/observed on a FF sensor, such as a 5DmII? Can you run your findings through a waveform? How much is the edge loss? Our eyes do a great job tricking us. From what I could see, I'd say 1.5 stops in the extreme corner, but who knows. The waveform can surely help us see, yes?

-ryan
 
Back
Top