andrewhake
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2009
- Messages
- 785
- Reaction score
- 55
- Points
- 28
I think the RED Hydrogen side-project would have led to products that could have existed in the action and mirrorless camera realm, pity the phone side of it led to its demise.
It's interesting to imagine what RED could do if they did want to make an action cam, even smaller than their Komodo crash/utility camera. Funny to also then imagine how, when people inevitably ask for a more fully featured version of the same thing, RED would have to make what adds up to a mirrorless camera, being the natural step back up from the action camera form.
Just can't see RED broadening out like that, if they're to remain a digital cinema camera company, and not get massacred competing with much bigger companies that have spent decades developing and refining their stills cameras to make them what they are today.
I do actually think RED could make a cinema-quality action-sized cam that could fit into their DSMC lineup, but it wouldn't be as fully featured as even the OG Komodo, while it would probably be at least as expensive as one. Which means, on the downside, it wouldn't appeal like the OG Komodo did to as wide of a potential user-base. While on the upside, it wouldn't actually be directly competing with the cheaper more established action cams.
Not being a camera or sensor designer, I don't know how feasible it would be in reality, but it's not hard to think of ways space saving and size reduction might be achieved, while maintaining the necessary level of image quality. It wouldn't be like any camera RED have made before though.
yeah people would be like why can’t this action cam form factor be my A cam and why doesn’t it have internal NDs!?