Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

shut up and shoot that Scarlet

Can't believe I have missed this thread! Way too busy with work - which I can't complain about. But here is a quick selection from my end...:

LR_Yamato.jpg


LR_Bugpee.jpg


LR_Crane.jpg


LR_Leaf.jpg


LR_Fuji.jpg


LR_Loom.jpg


LR_Macro2.jpg


LR_SkyTree.jpg


LR_Takahata.jpg


LR_Tesla.jpg


LR_TokyoSkyline.jpg


LR_Verypink.jpg


LR_Tsunami.jpg


LR_Mushroom.jpg


LR_Tree.jpg


LR_Falcon.jpg


LR_Sofa.jpg


That's just going through a single HDD (all I have a time for today...)

Keep 'em coming folks!

:sifone: Peter
 
Peter thank for the frames, very inspiring ;)
 
Thanks guys!

Nick - from top to bottom (all Canon except no.5 - RPZ):

01. Hand-in-hand - EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS USM
02. Peeing bug - EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro
03. Flying crane - EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM
04. Leaf - EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro
05. Mt. Fuji - RED PRO ZOOM 18-85mm @ 18mm
06. Loom - EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
07. Moss - EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro
08. Tokyo Sky Tree - EFs 17-55mm f/2.8 IS (non "L"!)
09. Autumn leaves - EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS USM
10. Tesla Roadster - EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
11. Tokyo skyline aerial - EFs 17-55mm f/2.8 IS (non "L"!)
12. Sakura - EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS USM
13. Van after the 11/03/11 tsunami - EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
14. Mushroom - EF 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS USM
15. Tree-trunk - EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
16. Falcon - EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM
17. Old sofa chairs - EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM

I always add sharpening in post - mostly using RCXP's alchemy tab. RED - unlike other cameras - does not "bake in" any sharpening, you have to do it yourself in post...

:sifone: Peter
 
Thanks for the info Peter; that was even much more than I was hoping for. I would have been satisfied with "Canon's". :)

I never feel like my sharpness is satisfactory. Maybe I'm overly critical of my own work . . . I mainly use some rather standard lenses on a Scarlet; Tokina 11-16, a 35 and an 85 Rokinon, and a small range of Contax Zeiss. In other words, I always see people getting, in my opinion, sharper images with the exact same camera, lenses, and settings.

Though, even before asking, I've found that I like to sharpen my Red footage a bit, no matter what I'm doing or working on. But too much, and it starts to look "digital", even if I'd like the result to be sharper. Even from what I posted a page or two ago in this thread, I found that Resolve made my footage look "digital" with less sharpening than RCX, but RCX wasn't getting mine as good as I wanted it either. Though, I'll have to re-try it a few stops down on my aperture. I'll probably get better results around f5.6 or f8.
 
GREAT GREAT images Peter. You are a poster child for Red's DSMC concept... those are great stills from motion. I'm impressed.
 
Peter, were those images only graded in rcx? They look great.
 
Deon thats sick!!

Love em, can I see action?
 
Thanks Eric.

The stills are part of a bigger documentary project so none of it will be "public" anytime soon but, I do intend to cut a montage of sorts at some point and I'll post it in here.

cheers
D
 
mostly 4kws and a couple were 3kws.
I had my 5D on me so it was quicker bringing that up to my eye to grab a still than it would be switching to 5K and back.

Thanks dudes.
D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top