Wayne Morellini
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
- Messages
- 6,157
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
What country is seriously going to invade the USA?
And if every house in America has an AR-15
And every fifth house has a 50 caliber sniper rifle
And every 20th house has a 50 Cal HMG
And every 50th house has a RPG
(this is why the 2nd Amendment exist)
Then who the hell ever has a chance on ever ever being able to overtake the whole of the USA?!
Reread it again. The reason they are not is because of military might. But you skipped over that, and it being in reference to your remark on having something less than a coast guard, how realistic is that? Or Iraq, or Afghanistan where a lot of weapons also exist, and I think the largest standing army and anti aircraft system of its time, but invasion still happened. I'll be realistic niave enough to think some proverbial pea shooters and a sub coast guard class defence system is going to prevent an invasion in this modern warfare world. Without a nuclear deterrent or sheild, and in the sub cost guard scenario, you could just bomb any city of too much trouble with strategic nukes a d build cities elsewhere. You start first by strategically bombing the sub coast guard bases, and it's over. You then can make rapid landfalls, and strategically wedge your way out through the under armed rural population, and starve cities out. Similar to how it has been done before in history. No great revelation, just the reality. So, the emporer has no cloths as far as the military isn't needed, because the military prevented the problem in the first place by being there, ready. It's like the quote from a movie, the storm is coming to destroy the town, and when it doesn't, storm adverted like it's miraculous. In this case storm damage is being prevented by a storm wall, but because there is no storm damage people actually like there is no need for a storm wall. The likely scenario, is without one the town would be damaged.
By the way. I said invasion, I don't think I said take over the whole country, though with a sub coast guard defense system, that could happen. But just the attempt means possible shortages and a drastic, affording capacino reducing economy. With the likely hood of loosing sections over time. Look what happened to Spanish northern American.
You don't know how bad it can get, in China during world war 2 a death camp was being set up which could kill everybody in the world 6 times over. It's diabolical. In the cold war there was a proposal to make a tanker into a giant nuclear bomb that would roam off the coast, and if the Soviet "experiment" was to fail, was proposed to be set off polluting the atmosphere and killing all life on Earth. Law enforcement is needed to stop crazy and protect the pacifists. It requires a balance of people to be safe. Peace if peace is just and good, and war if needed. I know a ex-special forces colonel, who argued with me that people have let the realisation of all our war and sacrifice, because I seek ethical compromise. I say, that true leadership is about having something left worth living for. He is right, but so am I. It comes to a point where politically you have to decide what is right and enough, and the conduct up to that point.
It's never really about this way or that, it is about what best to take from both sides to the middle ground.