Leland Haushalter
Well-known member
I think you hit the nail on the head Phil.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Let's keep in mind that Dragon is (likely) redefining cinema standards and, as such, we should consider only the very best in cine lenses when it comes to assessing Dragon's place and potential in cine craft, and all that that implies. At this point I'm not interested in which Voigtlander might work, or which S35 designs might be "good enough", and I know no one is going to show up on a Ridley Scott set with a Dragon and my battery of FF cinevised Nikon AI-s lenses.
Let's consider where Dragon's purported sensor size sits in this context, not to mention the possible implications of its off the charts DR, when it comes to optics. There are surely lenses that will work, however, I think there is something else going on behind the scenes at red. Things that might modify our views on this. ( :
It's not about the camera or lenses, it's about the person behind them. Ridley Scott could have shot Prometheus with Canon lenses and no one would have realized that.
Josh, you overlooked the context of my comments, we are talking about available lenses as far as the highest industry standards go. Of course Ridley Scott could have shot Prometheus on Canon lenses, heck, he could have shot it on pixie vision, but that has little to do with addressing the needs of an industry that is typically very demanding when it comes to optics. My point is, based upon the projected Dragon sensor size (still to be confirmed) it could very well be that cine lenses designed for S35 are rendered unusable. And that is something worth considering. This is conjecture at this time, of course, but I was interested in understanding RED's position on this as they push the boundaries out from traditional cine formats. Nothing too outlandish in that.
you can be sure it will be a better deal than selling your Scarlet privately and buying a new Epic.
My guess is that they can build a new Epic in minutes while it takes hours to gut the Scarlet, save a few Scarlet parts, re-assemble them with the new Epic parts, test, failed test, disassemble, search out the failed part, reassemble, test, test, test, then send back the Scarlet with a shorter-than-new warranty for a camera that may be more susceptible to a part failure. Much more efficient to just buy back the Scarlet, assemble a new Dragon Epic that is well matched internally. The Epic wouldn't present such problems due to fewer parts being switched out and the ones left are already turned to handle higher output than the Scarlet. One could say Scarlet owners may be the greatest beneficiaries of the new upgrade program because they will be getting a completely new and parts-matched Dragon. This is all supposed without any idea of price difference. Any way you cut it, I think we are going to be well-treated.Can someone explain why Scarlet isn't going to be able get the upgrade to Dragon? I understand the ASIC boards need to be changed out to match the Epic boards/specs but why can't they do it with Scarlet body? I'm grateful that RED is pushing the envelope in a big way but I told & bought the Scarlet mainly for upgrading purposes to gain entry into the Dragon world - eventually, sure for a price.
Mark...based on what evidence?
I'd be really happy...
Falkor!
Is it true that the Dragon Sensor will have it's own IR filtering? What about in camera NDs?