David Battistella
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2007
- Messages
- 10,003
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 38
Inadequate no, not performing up to specs, yes……We all understand the need to expose properly, that's not the issue here, as I see it. Folks are not concerned about severely underexposed footage, that's a problem no matter what camera you're using. The problem being, what seems to be that the image CAPTURED by the new OLPF is arguably a step back from the MX (in some areas) at 800 iso.
Having that extra layer of wondering is the footage going to be dealt with properly, pertaining to the DEB issue, in post, shouldn't be there. Of course with any camera system you can tweak things in post to improve the image. What I think people are concerned about, is with this "fix" as it is now, you need to "tweak" in post just to get back to where you thought you were when you left the set. That's a big wild card that shouldn't be there.
Ok. I see that point of view. But I don't agree really that MX outperforms dragon at 800 properly exposed. I'm more confortable at 800 ISO on dragon than I ever was on MX.
Battistella