- Moderator
- #101
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 13,392
- Reaction score
- 796
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Website
- www.phfx.com
Not sure I follow what you are saying. Isn't the whole issue they just rehoused SSD's and not even the best rated ones? Where is the engineering in that? In terms of the money spent to develop the RedMags? You mean the enclosure? That's very little design.
A key thing a lot of people are not thinking about at all when discussing this is the good deal of stress testing and R&D to even choose the media. It wasn't like one day they woke up and said "dude we're going to just toss this MSATA drive into an enclosure and call it a day". At the time MSATA was fairly new, there were a host of directions to go with the media. And yes the metal enclosure is even a stress tested thing. I know for a fact based on some posts here that there's various torque, weight, temperature, and other rigorous tests done to the cameras and media. I think Jarred posted one of the cameras frozen and even iced over in their temperature chamber that still booted. That's outside of the data rate tests to ensure non-stop recording without buffer issues, which the cameras still have warnings for, but I haven't seen them in many years.
And yes, the firmware in question with the previous thread has everything to do with what's going on within the camera and how it's writing data to the card. The various error codes we've seen when things go bad allude to the time spent to communicate with the media and do various checks and logging of issues. In fact, occasionally you'll get a warning that you should likely even securely format your media if things are segmented or some sort of firmware update recommends you do so.
Yes, on the surface it looks pretty cut and dry on what's inside the enclosure, but pretty much everybody is overlooking what it took to even put that stuff in there.
We'll never really know what RED's bottom line is on the media and the profits desired, but all of this plus the labor and support that comes with it has a cost associated with it outside of the base cost of components.
In the mix of all of this is the weirdness of technology evolving, red colored REDMAGs to indicate newer faster high speed cards over the OG black ones, larger capacity/faster ones being made, and the eventual move to the MINI-MAG form factor with the newer drives and it appears that there might have been some newer media overlap. I cracked open a few of my older REDMAGs out of curiosity (like in 2014 I think) and they are older drives compared to the stuff in the current MINI-MAGs. Also the media bay going from SATA 2.X to SATA 3.X, which we know even based on the older media readers versus the newer ones.
Just my POV really, the guy making these videos is mostly weaponizing these concepts it seems to highlight just the components in there and none of the work that even lead up to the design of the mags nor any of the history of media standards like SATA advancing. And just on the design side, you'll notice the mags don't fall out of the camera unless you are hitting some pretty notable G-force torques or dropping it from a decent height.
There's engineering going on both on the hardware and software side of things. It's just not the POV being put forward by the individual pushing out the viral stuff. And mostly this is just exactly what he's after it seems.
More or less why I'm just beating the drum and rhythm to the tune of tell RED their media costs too much or want different drives in there or want 3rd party media or whatever. They'll take that feedback. The viral stuff leading into harassment and borderline stalking behavior is pretty much never going to be listened to, within this community it led to very heated debates with insults being slung left and right, that's not something that should be happening and at it's core is part of what this guy wants to happen. And as I mentioned in a previous thread, there's still posts here on REDUSER where people cracked open the mags around 2012 and knew what was in there, even some older images and discussion online can be found, this is just being brought back up due to whatever history Jinni and RED have, which is all publicly view-able in terms of the timeline of legal activities between Washington through California and who went after who first. As a moderator, this again happened before. The only thing that has changed is the jilted angle of somebody pretty pissed off at RED and looking to clearly have a negative impact on their company and there's clearly more cameras out there.
And to the credit of Cinema 5D, they went to the source to get the official word without slashing around blindly with skepticism, conspiracy theories, and whatever. And yet again, I'll just note from the previous thread, all of this stuff has gone through rigorous FCC teardowns, NASA, and military scrutiny about the nomenclature and core components. If there was house worth burning down we would have heard it from a different source.