Stefan Antonescu
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
- Messages
- 868
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I think you're right Eki...My wild, yet somewhat educated guess is that there never was a $8000 S35 scarlet. That $1000 increase in price was for the 3K scarlet only, i think.
The 3K scarlet probably needs something like a cache for the 2nd stream of HDRx™™, and maybe a board that mixes the streams in real time, but the scarlet platform itself has the required processing power for the data throughput - there is enough headroom at moderate frame rates.
The case for S35 is different - merely adding image cache and mixing (or whatever the extra board required for HDRx™™ is) wasn't enough - due to higher resolution and thus higher amounts of data to push through, the scarlet platform's processing power was already more or less maxed out as is, at regular frame rates. So, in order to enable HDRx™™ is S35, they had to change it to epic platform which has more throughput.
In light of this, it might very well be that adding HDRx™™ to the camera now known as Epic-S required changes that up the cost not by $1000, but rather by $5000 (or whatever the final price will be).
...purely speculating here, but to me the above sounds pretty logical.
Thank you for pointing that out.