Erik Ponti
Member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2009
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Yes, but just watching it like that doesn't allow you to carefully examine it. That is, seeing if it really is fit for distribution.Visual proof was provided for those attending. First time round they didn't know they were watching REDRAY. 2nd and 3rd time round, people knew what Ted was up to with his demo and must have been looking at it critically knowing what it was.
Graeme
"Looking at it critically" is not good enough. It needs to be compared to the source, on a computer. They were probably looking for standard DCT compression artifacts -- which you would not see, since wavelet compression artifacts are different. Especially since (presumably) at the time they didn't know it was wavelet compression, just that it was compressed. If I'm wrong, then feel free to enlighten me, but AFAIK they didn't know how it was compressed.
I think since you [seem to be] are planning to pitch it as a product, it's imperative that you provide screencaps that can be used to really see how good it is. Preferably with a lossless version of the source (short) video, so it can be compared to other solutions.
If you don't provide screencaps that people can study for any reason other than "we don't consider it completely ready yet", then for me that means it doesn't compare.