- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #21
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 13,392
- Reaction score
- 796
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Website
- www.phfx.com
As always, thank you for all your insight Phil. I am trying to imagine the candle light scenes from Barry Lyndon shot on Dragon...... Kubrick would have undoubtedly been impressed.
I imagine Kubrick would have been equally fascinated with camera tech and lens tech these days. He didn't live in the world of clean ASA 500, 800, or 2000 stocks because they just never existed. I imagine he would have still shot film here and there, but knowing the tech nut he was he would have grasped onto modern digital cinema cameras and taken them to impressive heights. Probably would have freaked out about the creative potential of motion control as well. We'll never know really.
The cool thing about Barry Lyndon is that Kubrick went on that lens journey for a storytelling purpose to add to the period's aesthetic. He wasn't shooting shallow to shoot shallow, the inherit quality of the low light in the period would have led to a similar amount of depth in day to day life indoors. Oddly, I've got a Leica 65mm f/0.75 I've been slowly working on that shoots some extremely bizarre low light images. I pull it out to abstract work mostly.
I know Fincher and Cronenweth have been shooting wide open on the Master Primes and more recently with the Leica Summilux-C Primes at T1.4. It's a hard way of shooting in reality, but very much worth it.
Thanks Phil... copied and pasted into my notes.
Anytime. I think we're going to see an interesting tug of war coming up with HFR. Not so much on the adoption or if it's it's better than 24fps, but more on the how to do it right and make it look good side of things.






