Bill Anderson
Well-known member
Well well well, I would like to congratulate Mr. Cameron for making such a shrewd career move. ((( :
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Who said he is shooting Avater 2 on 1080P? He just bought 50 EPICs.
I would have thought Cameron would be using the Alexa M on which ever project he had lined up next.
http://www.videoaktiv.de/2011041257...-Alexa-M-modularer-Grossformat-Camcorder.html
it was a german report. (they talk about camerons next 3D blockbuster)
nice surprise with the choice for epic.
From the article (via Google Translator):
"Classic film camera men stay faithful Arri: The Alexa them is considered the ultimate in high-resolution single-sensor cameras (for all non-red fans). Now Alexa is much more flexible Born M. "
"And why Arri has built this camera? . Because they need a certain Mr Cameron - for his next blockbuster 3D, which is rotated from September. For mere mortals, the camera will then be available from spring 2012.
If the gods turn to Alexa, pulls the tail of a rat to be:
Thus, the ARRIRAW data format is also supported by the programmers at Tweak software, high end video editing in their RV software is now exhausted, supports the full gamut and contrast the immense amount of raw data.
The image processing specialists at The Foundry assume the Arri-file format (C and Alexa Log ARRIRAW) in their products and Storm Nuke."
I'm not sure what the rest of it means, but in the US, the Humane Society may have something to say about pulling the tails of rats:emote_hippie:
Nice article... just have to wonder now how accurate.
Jim
I was a bit surprised to see Arri downplay the importance of 4k in their NAB interview with John Fauer, saying they are "not in the pixel race" -- particularly when he asked if it would be upgradable to 4k down the road.
I'm sure they will continue to downplay it ... right up the point when their own 4k camera is readyI guess that's just how the industry works.
Anthony
While some camera companies say that 2K (and 1080P) is good enough... they are currently working on a 4K solution. And when they release it, I'll be quite curious how they figure out how to ignore what they said.
Jim
While some camera companies say that 2K (and 1080P) is good enough... they are currently working on a 4K solution. And when they release it, I'll be quite curious how they figure out how to ignore what they said.
Jim
While some camera companies say that 2K (and 1080P) is good enough... they are currently working on a 4K solution. And when they release it, I'll be quite curious how they figure out how to ignore what they said.
Jim
It will be a classic case of "doublethink".
"The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them...."
LOL. Or the simple cliche ... "that was then, this is now" ...
Anthony
Actually, Jim -- I was going to start a separate thread about this -- what happens when 4k finally does become the "standard"?
Obviously, anything shot on 1080 or 2k is in trouble. But what about film? Will they go back to originals and rework to get as close to 4k as possible?
I'm sure it's partly an economic decision, depending on demand for 4k of older footage -- but curious to how you see film being adapted to a 4k world.
Anthony
35mm film has absolutely no issues in the future 4K world. The resolution is there.
Jim