David Rasberry
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,266
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Believe me. many of those operations have the cash and need for EPCI more than ever. Don't disregard the size of this industry or the importance for high resolution imagery. Tonaci Tran has already shot wedding videos with his EPIC. I think it was one of the first things he posted.
Disagree completely. I'd take the resolution. There is no saying that they couldn't offer higher speed at lower frame size 3K and 2K.
If you read the post earlier. I am saying an MX sensor in a fixed Scarlet (bypassing 2/3 inch altogether).
I have to stress, I do not follow Scarlet development at all. All I know is it's a smaller chip and 3K.
David
If you mean moving to an S-35 4k sensor with a fixed lens, that is impractical. The cost of a decent reasonably fast (T3) cine quality zoom lens with a range of focal lengths equivalent to the 2/3" (18-144) to cover S35 would prohibitive. You would essentially wind up with a fixed lens camera sporting an optical assembly nearly the size and weight of a Red 15-150. The whole camera would be much larger and bulkier. An Epic-S would be cheaper. I would buy a sub $10k 2/3" fixed lens camera like the current Scarlet, but if it was going to cost more than $10k for a shooting package, I would not buy a fixed lens camera. Neither would most people.