Ketch Rossi
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2007
- Messages
- 15,041
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Sardinia, Italy
- Website
- www.afroditefilms.com
I think Zeb hit the nail on the head when he said the current Ronin looks more suited for a Canon 1D C/ GH4...
I actually with all do respect of course I could NOT disagree any stronger with the both of you in this silly assessment of the Ronin!!!
I have tested and heavily put to work 4 of the know Gimbals and 2 of the ones which are less known, and while all of them had the capacity to hold a Epic+UP/CP2/CN-E/Still Glass+sideGrip/w/Redvolt...
NONE of them had the capacity to actually BALANCE properly a fully loaded Epic with longer lenses such as the Summilux C Primes or Schneider Xenon glass.
The RONIN is in fact the FIRST Gimbal that has show the possibility to do this, and NOW with the addition of the XL arm coming in it will also allow for actually placing even a XL Module or V-Lock Module on the drear of the camera it self.
Which I can't talk or say about how good might be to add power on the rear of the camera till is tested, but you will be able to do should you choose to do so with the XL Arm on the Ronin...
NOW... Back to the very SILLY comment above quoted...
The Ronin has been tested and re-tested with the Epic and various lenses as utilized with other Gimbals till now, including the Movi, and it has performed extremely well... Making the above statement as silly as they come!!
And actually very surprise that Zeb itself could make such a SILLY statement and that you Adam could agree to it!!