Vincent Laforet
Well-known member
I think I figured out my mistake...
I think I figured out my mistake...
1/3 of the footage was shot at 2K at 300 fps. I did the math w/ pCam out in the field that day and 3400mm stuck. (I do think that is is a 3400mm+ equivalent at 2K btw... right???) What confused things was the fact that on the other 2/3rds I was shooting at 4K to get 120 fps. I asked a bunch of people and no one could give me a straight answer on the conversion when going from a 5K sensor to 4K... so I honestly gave up and let it go. Honest mistake - no idea it has turned into such a discussion here.
Whatever the number is - the mount + IS ROCKS!
I think I figured out my mistake...
Curious why Vincent did not bother to correct this, me among others asked respectfully how he came up with this math, but all these comments were deleted or never published. It is not about being right or wrong ; it is more that information like this can cause confusion among readers, especially coming from a guy like Vincent.
1/3 of the footage was shot at 2K at 300 fps. I did the math w/ pCam out in the field that day and 3400mm stuck. (I do think that is is a 3400mm+ equivalent at 2K btw... right???) What confused things was the fact that on the other 2/3rds I was shooting at 4K to get 120 fps. I asked a bunch of people and no one could give me a straight answer on the conversion when going from a 5K sensor to 4K... so I honestly gave up and let it go. Honest mistake - no idea it has turned into such a discussion here.
Whatever the number is - the mount + IS ROCKS!