Marc Wielage
Well-known member
I think this is a very good argument. The other one is that autofocus can get "confused" when an actor misses their mark and steps in front of another character, or you're doing a moving shot where lots of foreground people are walking by. How does the autofocus lens know you want to stay on the people 40' away and not the ones that are just 10' away from the camera?Even if autofocus is perfect (very unlikely, but let's be hypothetical) - who's going to make the decision as to which actor it focuses on during the scene, and at what point during the dialogue? What about a slow vs fast rack? Who's going to make all the creative focus decisions? A good 1st AC is usually very good at this...
No, I think manual focus is needed for a lot of reasons in narrative filmmaking and TV. I can see maybe it being used for fast-moving documentaries or perhaps static cameras in an interview where people don't move too much. But it's not a replacement for a human. Not yet.
James is very wise. I agree completely. There's a real art to whst an AC does with focus, and I have enormous respect for the ones that do their jobs well.Turning the knob is the easy part - knowing when, why & adding the creativity is the hard part...