Eric Trageser
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Website
- www.erictrageser.com
It is a mini-Nuke in a cigarette box.
Jim
THAT's the analogy I was looking for.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It is a mini-Nuke in a cigarette box.
Jim
To support that you would need D.C power and a serial communications port for the motor (or the motor controller)
Those features are provided on the Base I/O and Pro I/O Modules .... plus extra I/O and a 2nd viewfinder output.
We do understand that many people already own one of these companies lenses (or both). We want to give our customers as many options as possible.
This year (late) and under $10K.
Jim
I'm guessing an underwater housing that connects straight to the cooling ports on the Epic and Scarlet bodies would be cool, allowing the water itself cool the camera. There would always be the option of selling a special fan meant for underwater usage :ihih:
I believe they've stated that the mini-primes are manual only.just a quick question: will the red mini primes for the 2/3 scarlet have electronic focus control ?
In previous threads he stated it would be out this year. Which would make a lot of sense to have it out by Christmas b/c of the market it's designed for.
How about a Vocas matte box?Question: Will there be a detachable lens hood for the Scarlet Fixed? Is it asking too much for it to have a built-in lens flap (cover) with a switch? This is one of the features I really liked about the EX1.
How about a Vocas matte box?
![]()
Fantastic. Hats off.
![]()
Just wondering...is there any chance there could be some sort of shortcut connection between camera and LCD for this setup only, for both Epic and Scarlet, like a "compact setup connector" ?
Do you mean... A shorter cable?
This thread is getting pretty big now so I apologize if it was answered before.
Will the 24-75mm AF be significantly lighter than the 18-85mm? It looks smaller.
How about a Vocas matte box?
![]()
Good point. I was thinking about it from a cinema or ENG viewpoint. Myopic, as usualHow does the Phantom do it? If I'm not mistaken, people use the Phantom on sidelines for big-budget live sports, and everything seems to be focused well.
It is smaller and lighter than the 18-85mm. But we haven't posted a pic of it yet. Not sure which lens you are looking at that you think is the 24-75mm.
Jim