Philip Lima
Well-known member
Philip - if you have the MX working with both DSMC1 and DSMC2, you must have "biased relationship" with DJI and for sure you have "ulterior motives". Stop "kissing their ass" for crying out laud...!!!
Sorry, I could not resist... ;o)
For some reason if you can make your s*** work well - it can not be because you are a professional and know what you are doing. Some folks come to this industry with next to no experience and expect an easy walk in the backyard. I have done 7 years of steadicam operation and 10 years of filming aerials from full-size aircrafts before starting with these hand-held gimbals. This is no different then some folks buying professional cinema cameras and expect to become DoP overnight. Do you need such an extensive experience and knowledge before you start using these hand-held gimbals? No. But it sure helps understanding the core technology, physics and all the not-so-obvious aspects of this craft. Once a year at the end of February I teach week-long course "camera in motion" at the prestigious LASALLE institute in Singapore as part of their 3-year long filmmaker's course. We always start with the absolute basics and the plain physics involved. It goes a long way to understanding how all this gear works, how we can make it work properly and how to make the best out of it. Some folks thinks that DJI sends me "special super-stable" equipment to test. They are missing the point of "beta-testing". Beta gear is by far the most unstable, unpredictable and it always comes with NO user manual. The whole point of beta-testing is to discover all the problems and issue and find fixes / solutions before the product is released. And to DJI credit - even their beta gear works a lot better then I always expect it to. I have been impressed with the built quality (most other beta gear I test from other companies look nothing like the final product to be released), cleverness of engineering and deep understanding of our craft. Almost everyone I know at DJI actually uses this equipment and you can tell. They might have now become a massive multi-national corporation - but their company was founded out of passion, love and respect for our craft. And they have managed to keep these core values through out their phenomenal growth. Is all their gear perfect without any flaws? Of course not. But they are quick to respond, solve issues and evolve their products. Does that remind you of someone? I know lot of people hate when I compare DJI to RED and sure there are some key differences between these two companies. But they both have the same core values and they both have turned upside down their respective fields. Actually - come to think of it - they actually created these fields. The fact that I can today go out and shoot 4K+ RAW high-speed aerials with a complete system that costs less then $25K is both unbelievable and a testament to both of these companies...
So thank you Philip for chiming in and keep up the great work!
:sifone: Peter
Thanks for making me laugh out loud!
I will definitely post a bit more in this thread as I spend more time flying the M600/MX and testing it with other cameras. Next up I'm mounting my Canon 5Ds for some 50MP+ stills, then I'm hoping to borrow a friends Alexa Mini and give that a go in the MX. I will also post what I can from the projects I've shot with the kit already, I'm hoping the wakeboard edit will be available online in the next week or so as it will have a lot of drone shots in it.
If anyone has an M600/MX and has questions, please feel free to post them here and I'll do my best to help get things dialed in for you.
