Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

AutoFocus - Komodo - are you going to use it?

Jeffery Anderson

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
San Francisco
I know a big selling point for some with the Komodo is the size and Autofocus... you can rig it anywhere and turn on autofocus and let the operator go crazy with it

are some people dreading autofocus and simply a setup, where you just get coverage and do really plan a shot with a 1st AC to get the look you want?

it does seem like if your coverage is a single-tracking shot, then you can just follow them and keep it simple...

does seem like an amazing opportunity for car interiors or tracking from a moving position, e.g. car, bike, skateboard ... but, that's very stylized and seems like cinematography has moved away from that

any input or experiences are welcome.
 
Yes and no.

Do I need it at all times? Nope.

Will I use it? Yes. When I want to use it.


Autofocus is a hot topic in the industry and I am a bit of a fundamental filmmaker who prefers to pull and operate manually, but I'd be a fool to ignore a tool that might help get the shot.

A quick jog around higher end sets and seeing how Light Ranger 2 units are being used and more recently things like Redrock Micro's Halo unit shipping, and desire for a tiny AF solution starts looking very appealing.

Phase Detect, Contrast Detect, and sensor based AF isn't exactly the same as a full blown mini-Lidar unit, but the goal is the same. Track a moving subject without the assistance of um.... an assistant.
 
Fast moving, one man band documentary setups - sign me up if it works well. I don’t need it so much for situations like a sit down interview or tracking slower action but for things like gimbals and any action where it could be difficult to operate and manually pull focus without an assistant, then that could be very beneficial. I don’t own any cameras that do autofocus well. Canon and Sony seem to have that going for them.
 
I actually think its perfect for a simple sit down interview as long as the focus sticks to the face without hunting around.
 
If the autofocus can hold the tracking well, this would be a godsend for my smaller and low end, skeleton crew shoots. Is a game changer for gimbal work. Will save some time (mount/connect wireless FF -Rec & Trans) and weight (Lighter Gimbal!!)
 
Reliable, smooth face-tracking autofocus is essential for any new camera I purchase moving forward. If Komodo has it, I'm in. It's just too darn useful, especially for simple, sit-down interviews where the person can't sit still.
 
Autofocus is a hot topic in the industry and I am a bit of a fundamental filmmaker who prefers to pull and operate manually, but I'd be a fool to ignore a tool that might help get the shot.

for getting stylized shots in a single take without a rehearsal, this could a easy answer

Phase Detect, Contrast Detect, and sensor based AF isn't exactly the same as a full blown mini-Lidar unit, but the goal is the same. Track a moving subject without the assistance of um.... an assistant.

I couldn't find any mini-lidar focus-pulling solutions... maybe I didn't search well enough? Personally, I don't know enough about how the technology works to comment, just more of applications as what I would like it to do...

Autofocus could get crazy and you could do a million things... imagine this, you use face detection to analyze the size of the subjects head and use the zoom motor to automatic compensate to keep the subject the same size in frame at the same time keep focus... e.g. dolly zoom

with the same effect, you could set a timed zoom out e.g. going from 85mm to 24mm

really the only error could be the operator, which if you automated a gimbal to frame for you, by focusing on head, arms, eyes... then you could keep perfect headroom/frame size... it's pretty limitless

do you think Jarred will add some autofocus communication out of the Komodo to a lens motor for manual lenses? (wonder how you would calibrate it)
 
No doubt that autofocus will change the way of doing things. For example filming horses on a race track. My colleges did such job, The camera setup was an Alexa with big optimo on a scorpio crane car. On the gimbal above the Alexa we put a little Sony a7 and set it to autofocus with a long lens with super shallow focus. On the optimo we had the best AC in town. All I can say, 90% of the footage from the a7 was tack sharp and very usable, the optimo footage with hand driven focus had almost the the complete opposite ratio, not an easy task to focus on long lens when horses run, camera moves fast and the camera car is chasing the horses back and forth with no coordination in between, the AC did a good job. But the a7 actually just sticked to the skin of the horses and pretty much stayed there in a really impressive way. I don't remember the setting used but it was something with multiple focus points and it did something no focus puller could ever do.

So I think when we get such features in better cameras then yes it will be used a lot. As now there is not too many people that put the a7 on a crane car. But its easy to see if you use it on a gimbal, steady or what ever, it can simply stick focus to a face like no AC ever could when pulling focus by hand, so yes I see it very much as the future.
 
Maybe I have missed an announcement somewhere buried here on Reduser but why are people assuming that the Komodo has effective Autofocus? The present iteration of AF in Red cameras is not effective. Sony and Canon have leveraged decades of expensive R&D in their still cameras to implement their schemes as the real work is done in the camera body not the AF lenses. Don't get me wrong I hope the Komodo has an AF system as good as the Sony FX9 or Canon C500mk2.
 
Maybe I have missed an announcement somewhere buried here on Reduser but why are people assuming that the Komodo has effective Autofocus? The present iteration of AF in Red cameras is not effective. Sony and Canon have leveraged decades of expensive R&D in their still cameras to implement their schemes as the real work is done in the camera body not the AF lenses. Don't get me wrong I hope the Komodo has an AF system as good as the Sony FX9 or Canon C500mk2.

that's a Jarred question, or Phil who testing it also... AF supposed to be super good

they all have access to similar tech innovations(Canon, Sony, Red). my guess from the skateboard and extreme sport Jarred posts about, I assume this is the ultimate action cam ... but, you also have guys like Soderbergh and Michael Bay shooting real content with it... me personally, it looks like a great camera for small gimbals, car interiors... stylized shots that are popular with breaking bad, or better call Saul, now. maybe someone will use one for a cool Cloverfield type POV film... never know
 
I don’t own any cameras that do autofocus well. Canon and Sony seem to have that going for them.

Olympus now matches Sony, as far as I have seen. I do have an Olympus but it's an older model with CDAF. That works very well for photos, but certainly not for motion. Fuji is apparently gaining, so things are getting very interesting in that market.

I do believe that AF of some kind does belong in film making. You are a fool if you reject it outright. But in no way is it a magic bullet.

Occasionally I see these things on top of cine cameras, kind of like a pair of blowhorns. I first noticed these on Dan Mindel's Instagram account. I learned that they are some kind of ultrasonic rangefinders:

https://www.focusbug.com
 
Back
Top