Peter Moretti
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,595
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
Okay, I'm a big fan of Red, but I'm no fanboy. The below explains where you guys, IMHO, are missing it big time. And it simply blows my mind.
People have been clamoring for a DNxHD/ProRes proxy module for years. I know the $13K Meizler Module is coming soon.
But Red seems to not understand that we need editable proxies now, not some mega module to be released at some future date. The dreaded, illegal new Sony F's are out, and they are good. But they don't record DNx or ProRes, which sucks for editorial. So why isn't Red exploiting this to their advantage? IDK.
It simply blows my mind that Red can develop entire lines of cameras, lenses, accessories... but can't make a freaking snap on recorder. Convergent Design, SoundDevices, Atomos, BMD all make external recorders... but Red can't make one that simply attaches to back of their cameras? Avid makes DNxHD encoding chips and has been losing money for approaching a decade. Won't they sell you some?
First Red tried to get us to edit on 1K proxies of .R3D's. That died on the vine. Then you tried to convince us that H.264 is a viable option for professional editing environments. Well now you seem to understand that it's not, and that we need DNxHD and ProRes. But where are they?
Sony does not offer this, which sucks for them... but neither do you!
And please, people can argue all they want about 3rd party options being available, but an integrated Red module is a better solution for reasons that I hope don't need explaining. So please, you are professional company. So stop trying to convince us into what we don't want and instead give us what we do need and have been asking for for literally years.
All of Red's advances are great and TRULY impressive. 6K w/ 20 stops of DR sounds awesome, but without DNxHD 36 or ProRes, how do you expect editorial to work with it? RedCine-X transcode? Files from a hodgepodge of external recorders w/ different naming conventions? Really?
Why you guys continue to miss this point is beyond me.
People have been clamoring for a DNxHD/ProRes proxy module for years. I know the $13K Meizler Module is coming soon.
But Red seems to not understand that we need editable proxies now, not some mega module to be released at some future date. The dreaded, illegal new Sony F's are out, and they are good. But they don't record DNx or ProRes, which sucks for editorial. So why isn't Red exploiting this to their advantage? IDK.
It simply blows my mind that Red can develop entire lines of cameras, lenses, accessories... but can't make a freaking snap on recorder. Convergent Design, SoundDevices, Atomos, BMD all make external recorders... but Red can't make one that simply attaches to back of their cameras? Avid makes DNxHD encoding chips and has been losing money for approaching a decade. Won't they sell you some?
First Red tried to get us to edit on 1K proxies of .R3D's. That died on the vine. Then you tried to convince us that H.264 is a viable option for professional editing environments. Well now you seem to understand that it's not, and that we need DNxHD and ProRes. But where are they?
Sony does not offer this, which sucks for them... but neither do you!
And please, people can argue all they want about 3rd party options being available, but an integrated Red module is a better solution for reasons that I hope don't need explaining. So please, you are professional company. So stop trying to convince us into what we don't want and instead give us what we do need and have been asking for for literally years.
All of Red's advances are great and TRULY impressive. 6K w/ 20 stops of DR sounds awesome, but without DNxHD 36 or ProRes, how do you expect editorial to work with it? RedCine-X transcode? Files from a hodgepodge of external recorders w/ different naming conventions? Really?
Why you guys continue to miss this point is beyond me.