Christian Schmitt
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2014
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
What I said was: smaller, lighter, faster and cheaper. I would also expect that media to work all the time. Just like every other CF-card I've owned. So when that skater pulls off that trick he worked on for months—I actually get it on the card.
I said "gladly lose a shot or two" in situations that that are for personal benefit only, to not have to deal with the ridiculous sentiment that Cfast cards will break all the time and Mini-Mags never miss a beat.
I guess this is were current RED users and prospect RED users views just clash:
Part of the reasons of buying into the RED ecosystem is the belief to get features, only RED (and maybe other high-end cameras) offer.
10 years ago that was one reason for me, to buy into Panasonic's P2 system.
A pro-recording system, that never lost a shot.
Did I get corrupted files with P2?
Yes, once, with an 8GB card, that cost way over 1000$.
When the 5D happened and all the cameras that followed many professionals were hesitant to shoot on CF or SD cards.
At that time the argument against using them was the same, the argument for it was pro-photographers use it all the time to shoot once-in-a-lifetime-hit-or-miss images.
And here we are, with millions of hours of footage shot on CF and SDHC.
The Raven is for RED, what the HVX200 was for Panasonic: A gateway to its at certain points proprietary ecosystem.
Still, you get a lot for way less than the manufacturers otherwise offerings.
But to make it work for both sides, certain things will stay proprietary and thus expensive.
The good thing about RED is, the proprietary parts can be used further down the path.
This is nothing new and a common business strategy (if I recall, Wilkinson invented this, by offering disposable razor blades).
We will most likely never see a CFast module from RED.
But most likely external HDMI/SDI recorders by Atomos or CD.
This will be for the adventurous of us then