Jiri Vrozina
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2010
- Messages
- 991
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Too bad the RED primes are waving good bye.
and why the hell wouldn't they focus on a 18mm f1.4/1.5, 35mm f1.4/1.5, and a 100mm f1.4/1.5?!?! Wouldn't that make most sense for their current cine prime set?
I wonder how much would Full frame 18mm T1.5 Cost and Weight??
why does a cine lens need to cover FF? The standard is s35. FF is a DSLR thing but cool to have if you can. It would be the most expensive to manufacture for sure. If they did a s35 18mm t1.5, it would sell like crazy to those who can't afford the high end cine glass like master primes, leicas, cookes, etc. A t1.5 ff lens would just be a huge bonus.
I don't get Canon's lens folks. They are being begged for some really basic lenses to be improved like the 50 1.4 and 35 1.4 which are very long-in-the-tooth and for an IS 24-70. Most of their primes are so neglected that the new zooms out-perform them. Instead they are releasing a $16,000 200-400 mm zoom.
On the Cine front why don't they look in their own archives and start where they left-off with k35s.