Kemalettin Sert
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
- Messages
- 3,513
- Reaction score
- 22
- Points
- 48
- Location
- Los Angeles CA
- Website
- www.kemalettinsert.com
Jim Jannard: Lights? Where we're going, we don't need lights.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Ok so 2 questions, (ok maby 3), 1. Is 21 stops native, or HDRX? 2. If its native, what would HDRX be? 3. Has the ISO numbers changed? (I mean like it was 2,000 cleaner than 800, has it changed at all?)
yes native..HDRx gone we dont need it anymore![]()
One additional thought before the champagne.
With this level or latitude and what we are referring to as native ISO 2000 we'll be able handle some of the stranger low light conditions that sometimes can produce "super saturation" within the image on modern cameras. That's my theory until its tested. Really interesting potential there as well.
There is something important with Dragon in regards to this that we will discuss soon... Graeme has been pretty busy.
Yes, for me the key question is, what is the lowest levels of black the Dragon sensor will be able to recognize from noise (say, compared to the sensor of Epic-X)? The answer will tell more than any ISO value, which quite looses it's meaning when the dynamic range gets this high -if ISO has ever meant anything precise in the post-film digital era.
It appears that the Dragon will have about 4 stops more DR and less than half the noise of the current Mysterium-X sensor.
Dragon Monochrome...
Dragon clearly 20+ stops
WooooooW....so technically what leap is that in Moore's law?
It appears that the Dragon will have about 4 stops more DR and less than half the noise of the current Mysterium-X sensor.
Jim