Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Welcome the 18mm RPP to the family...

I disagree - the lens I am most requiring is a 14mm for shooting interiors - the slightly smaller neg on the red means that sometimes even 16mm is a little tight for some directors.

Really? Interesting. I recently acquired a 14mm and it's so wide it feels like a specialty lens. In what specific situations/shots do you find yourself pulling out the 14?
 
Really? Interesting. I recently acquired a 14mm and it's so wide it feels like a specialty lens. In what specific situations/shots do you find yourself pulling out the 14?

The Duclos Tokina 11-16 Ultrawide is an EXCELLENT companion to the RPP's
(See LENS SALT Tests). Its also featherweight and perfect for steadi work.

Eventually will be nice to have the RPP's plus (14,16, 40, 65, 135 etc) as Jim has stated in posts this past summer. but in the interim the Tokina is an affordable ($3495) stop gap.
 
The Duclos Tokina 11-16 Ultrawide is an EXCELLENT companion to the RPP's
(See LENS SALT Tests). Its also featherweight and perfect for steadi work.

Eventually will be nice to have the RPP's plus (14,16, 40, 65, 135 etc) as Jim has stated in posts this past summer. but in the interim the Tokina is an affordable ($3495) stop gap.

Tim, wait till you see the 14mm shots in Descensus. Wow! Couldn't have done that production without it. Looking forward to seeing some more stuff on your Tokina.

For the next focal length I want (after 18mm) is that I really want the 65mm, moreso than a 16, 40, 135, etc. I'd use it for so many closeups. Repeatedly I find that a 50mm is too wide for a good closeup but 85mm is just too close, you need to haul the camera back to make it not a Sergio Leone closeup :-)
 
Me wants one!
Metric please!
And don't underestimate the amount of metric orders this time, please! :wink:
 
remember.. the 25mm weighs 6.15 lbs... so its pretty close in comparison :)

Good point, Jarred. I realize something has to give when trying to make sharp, fast, contrasty lenses at a price unheard of...and if the worst thing about the Red Pro Primes is that I have to build up my shoulders and arms some more, I can live with that!

Shawn, I second you on wanting to see a 65mm. And a 40!
 
12, 14, 40, 65, 135 for me :)

But...18mm...mmmm...I'm happy with for a long time ;)

I agree with Tim, the Duclos 11-16mm is an amazing lens for the price and match seamlessly with the RPPs.

N
 
Remember that when shooting 5K EPIC... a 25mm acts more like a 20mm, a 50mm acts like a 40mm, etc.

Jim
 
Jarred,

When will we be able to make deposits and place orders? I'd love to get an order in this year.

Soon.. we are still locking down the exact pricing and doing the last round of testing.
 
Remember that when shooting 5K EPIC... a 25mm acts more like a 20mm, a 50mm acts like a 40mm, etc.

Jim

Hi Jim,

So a 135 & 180 would be very useful then.

Stephen
 
uhhh compared to s35...its less (ff35 base FOV) crop factor.

:emote_couch:

uuuh, our reference point is already s35. so indeed a traditional 14mm for an s35 camera would be roughly like a 12mm (assuming the 14mm will cover 5k) if put on a 5k epic or scarlet. I'm following Jim's previous statement as quoted in my post. Not sure what you are trying to say?

If you scooped that canon 1.8 from canada, you got yourself a killer deal.

I'm hopeful for a 180mm or 200mm RPP.
 
uhhh compared to s35...its less (ff35 base FOV) crop factor.

:emote_couch:

James, if it is 14mm on S35 then a widening the sensor to 5k will widen the image projected by the lens as well since it can cover that resolution. It would have around the S35 equivalent field of view of a 12mm S35 lens.
 
James, if it is 14mm on S35 then a widening the sensor to 5k will widen the image projected by the lens as well since it can cover that resolution. It would have around the S35 equivalent field of view of a 12mm S35 lens.

Well understood. Jim's original post didn't give a reference so I'm having a little fun, ergo the couch. When I think about all the DoF posts around these days....

That being said, to nit pick, the lens doesn't so much cover the resolution per say, but the imager size.
 
Back
Top