Gavin Greenwalt
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2006
- Messages
- 7,614
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 40
What I find lame about the "Inner Circle" is that he is charging for what Cinematographers have always done naturally and for free - share information. I didn't look too deep - but "virtual mentorship"? And charging for it? I have volunteered for the Canadian Society of Cinematographers for 10+ years now and considerate it a duty to "foster" the art of cinematography. I especially enjoy talking to "up and coming" DP's and helping out with knowledge and advice. It is the same kindness and spirit of sharing that helped me become a successful cinematographer. I make my money shooting. I'm not going to charge to impart advice and information to eager, interested young shooters.
The counter argument is that the quality of the education suffers if you aren't devoting resources to doing it 'right'. And without revenue it's tough to make the case to devote a lot of resources. I offer a lot of information and tools and code for free--but it's scattered here there and everywhere and it's nowhere near the level of polish that I could deliver if someone was paying me to "do it right". It's also largely targeted at things that I need to spend time on already, packaging it up to some degree and punting it out into the interwebs isn't that much extra work. However if you take a look at something like FXGuidePHD they are delivering an organized and well polished product. They also then have the resources to vastly improve their work. For instance FXGuide.com's news section is generally very good and it's funded as marketing for FXGuidePHD so there is a halo effect of a well funded educational program also delivering benefits to the broader community.
If I had to pick as a student between scrapping and scrounging for nuggets of wisdom on a web forum or just being connected straight to the fire hose of learning for $15 a month the choice would be an easy one for me. What's the cost of wasted time?