Jesper Sichlau
Well-known member
Would multiple upgrades from Scarlett to Epic to Dragon REALLY bring prices down? I'd argue not. I'd argue the whole upgrade process probably costs Red more money in the long run. They still need to buy those hardware pieces, and swap them out with the ones you have now. So there are not any savings on hardware, on top of that, I have a feeling it would cost Red more money because of time and money factor. Surely making an Epic on the assembly line requires less attention from technicians and/or time than receiving your shipped Scarlett, opening it up, cleaning it out, removing the old hardware, installing the new, running diagnostics, and etc. Now if they did that multiple times for you, because instead of buying an Epic or Dragon, you upgrade through the several intermediary upgrade paths, as you suggest, they are now doing this to your camera multiple times.
Trust me, it's probably less expensive for them to just have you buy a factory line Dragon, than to upgrade your Scarlett with new sensors, processors, and other hard ware over multiple upgrade sessions.
I do feel for people who can't afford an Epic or Dragon, but that does not mean you are owed anything.
The Scarlet was founded upon parts of the Epic that wasn't good enough, these components will most likely not be part of the Epic Dragon, and people will be turning them in, thus making them available.
Frankly I don't care that it's "probably less expensive for them to just have you buy a factory line Dragon, than to upgrade your Scarlet with new sensors" Red choose to make upgrades part of their identity, not me. Maybe there's a reason why other companies don't do this.