PatrickFaith
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 2,560
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Location
- California
- Website
- www.pudls.com
"Your Amazon.com order of "Prometheus (Blu-ray 3D/ Bl..." has shipped!" WOOT !
I have all ready been watching Prometheus on my higher resolution ipad ... actually looks perty good on the ipad but not very immersive . I also want the blu-ray for the added material.
Also, in a wider context, I am going through a bit of emotional debate on projecting it. The 16:9 fills my room way better then the 2.4, also Prometheus imax 3D was 1.66 or 2.0 aspect ratio. The 2.4 ratio is only 858 pixels high through the blu-ray ... which when you spread it wide on the projector that is 15 feet wide with that real crisp with blu-ray algorithm (i.e. not doing the dcp jpeg2k circle fuzzyness) ... kinda looks a bit icky. From a kind of old school viewpoint, I prefer the 1.66 aspect ratio in my projector room but I can't get Prometheus at high resolution in that format(lmao ... I'm hoping Ridley will do a 4k Prometheus I when Prometheus II comes out, possibly update the sound a bit too?).
As a side note, since i'm using Prometheus as my major reference point for my own film(I mentally compare my film to Prometheus as I watch my dailies being projected - it's sometimes depressing), I am rethinking 2.4 as a standard format for home laser systems in favor of 16:9 ( 2.4 doesn't fit most rooms very well ... and that 858 bit resolution is a hard pill to take). Also doing a DI that is the superset of 2.4, 2.0, and 16:9 (i.e. 2592x1080 so i don't have to uprez the 2.4 to get a 16:9), is just a bit too non-standard for my workflow. hmmm ... hmmm???
I have all ready been watching Prometheus on my higher resolution ipad ... actually looks perty good on the ipad but not very immersive . I also want the blu-ray for the added material.
Also, in a wider context, I am going through a bit of emotional debate on projecting it. The 16:9 fills my room way better then the 2.4, also Prometheus imax 3D was 1.66 or 2.0 aspect ratio. The 2.4 ratio is only 858 pixels high through the blu-ray ... which when you spread it wide on the projector that is 15 feet wide with that real crisp with blu-ray algorithm (i.e. not doing the dcp jpeg2k circle fuzzyness) ... kinda looks a bit icky. From a kind of old school viewpoint, I prefer the 1.66 aspect ratio in my projector room but I can't get Prometheus at high resolution in that format(lmao ... I'm hoping Ridley will do a 4k Prometheus I when Prometheus II comes out, possibly update the sound a bit too?).
As a side note, since i'm using Prometheus as my major reference point for my own film(I mentally compare my film to Prometheus as I watch my dailies being projected - it's sometimes depressing), I am rethinking 2.4 as a standard format for home laser systems in favor of 16:9 ( 2.4 doesn't fit most rooms very well ... and that 858 bit resolution is a hard pill to take). Also doing a DI that is the superset of 2.4, 2.0, and 16:9 (i.e. 2592x1080 so i don't have to uprez the 2.4 to get a 16:9), is just a bit too non-standard for my workflow. hmmm ... hmmm???