Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Nikon "G" 1.4 primes, a mini review...

Evin Grant

Moderator
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
4,433
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
SoCal
Website
www.evingrantdp.com
I just purchased the new Nikon "G" series F1.4 lesnes and although in the past I've done very extensive reviews, since I do not currently have my Red One or a new Epic in my possession I'm just going to post a little mini review based on my impressions using a humble Nikon D3 and D7000.

At one point or another I've owned pretty much every fast Nikon prime made from the 58mm f1.2 NOCT to the 28mm f1.4 Aspheric and every version of the 50mm 1.4 in both AF and MF. I've also shot with the Canon 24mm f1.4, 50mm and 85mm f1.2, Zeiss 85mm 1.4 ZF, Superspeed and Master Prime lenses so I'm pretty familiar with the strengths and tradeoffs of highspeed designs. In general it's been folly to expect stellar performance from any F/T1.4 of faster lens wide open, the Master Primes were some of the first lenses to really seem to accomplish this, on the still side Nikon's 28mm 1.4 Aspheric did acceptably well at 1.4 but improved dramatically by F2. The only still lenses that seemed truly comfortable wide open were the very expensive Leica M Aspherical 35mm and 50mm 1.4, followed recently by the 21 and 24mm 1.4s and the Ultra Prime priced 50mm .95 Noctilux.

All this leads me to the new "G" series Nikon 1.4 primes, they have been announced for a while and tricking out of Japan so I decided to pick them up before the shortages from the earthquake caught up with the limited supply here in the US. I had sold all my previous generation f1.4 Nikkors last year so this was a planned purchase and was mostly motivated by the faster AF-S motors that will also facilitate there use on Epic. What I had not anticipated was the improvements that Nikon had made in redesigning the 35, 50 & 85mm and the brand new 24mm.

4x1.4s.jpg


There is minimal edge enhancement sharpening added in Adobe camera RAW, this is just to negate the effects of the in camera low pass filter. The files do show a smidge of Jpeg compression artifacts so be gentle.

I'll start wide with the 24mm...
24mm.jpg


Resolution is great, especially for f1.4 but the really impressive aspect is the complete lack of veiling flare. Look at the blown out window in the upper right corner of the frame and then check out how crisp and contrasty the left side is and 100% grab.

35mm.jpg


The 35mm is a dead on match for the 24mm in terms of resolution and contrast, all of the new 1.4s have a 9 blade rounded iris for pleasing Bokeh, they also focus considerably closer than previous versions with the two wides focusing under 1 foot!

50mm.jpg


The 50mm is the sole lens without the new Nano crystal coat, it's also the only one that's under $1000, however it still performs admirably and appreciably better than it's predecessor wide open. Although it's the least whizbang of the bunch it should have no problem intercutting.

85mm.jpg


The 85mm is the biggest surprise though, the last generation of 85mm 1.4 Nikkor was a real favorite of mine and I had expected great things of it's successor but I had not imagined that in addition to improving the performance wide open they would be able to make the king of smooth even butterier. The Bokeh of this lens is just mouth watering, backgrounds just dissolve into a puddle of color and tone leaving just a fine razor thin line of impeccable sharpness.

Ok, enough gushing, I can't wait to get my Epic and a Nikon G mount to try these out.
 
Thanks for the review Evin. I guess there are two pieces that would make these an obvious choice over their Canon counterparts:

1. Estimated availability of the Nikon mount for Epic
2. Availability of the Redmote Pro and its viability as a decent wireless follow focus (to negate the reverse focus gear issue)

Jarred?
 
Thanks for the review, Evin. This is the set I have been seriously considering for the Epic. Sounds like it will work as well as I had hoped.
 
Couple of years ago I ran across a 14-24 and put it on my test projector. And that's exactly why I made my Prolock. Nikon is the King of Glass. The colors look alive. Sharpness and contrast are outstanding. These four lenses plus the three zooms 14-24, 24-70 and the 70-200 make the dream set. I should stop now before I get in trouble...
 
Couple of years ago I ran across a 14-24 and put it on my test projector. And that's exactly why I made my Prolock. Nikon is the King of Glass. The colors look alive. Sharpness and contrast are outstanding. These four lenses plus the three zooms 14-24, 24-70 and the 70-200 make the dream set. I should stop now before I get in trouble...

Preach it, Brother! Been a Nikon user for decades. Love that glass.
 
Since these lenses don't have manual irises, how would you control that on a Red One?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #11
Thanks for the review Evin. I guess there are two pieces that would make these an obvious choice over their Canon counterparts:

1. Estimated availability of the Nikon mount for Epic
2. Availability of the Redmote Pro and its viability as a decent wireless follow focus (to negate the reverse focus gear issue)

Jarred?

Of course these are the questions, but I do think that Red is on it. I will still be using my Optimo DPs for most cinema work, but for light weight/location work the new Nikkors offer some real compelling options.
 
Thanks for the pics Evin. Great shots!

Does your Nikon do moving images? In other words, can you test breathing/image shift with these lenses?
 
Thanks Evin for a nice images!

Then I was also counting on that fast Nikon G prime combo...

Just in a case if you have more time to do a kind of second part of your test at more convenient situations with low and available light something

like a car inside shot during a night drive, ordinary street night shot that could involve a mix of many lights from cars, streetlight vapor and neon, night cityscape, etc,...

Only in that sort of test we could see possible lens aberrations (mostly coma, chromatic aberration, diverse flares, light bubbles and ghosting, etc...).

Why?

Because shooting dogs or girlfriends in a way doesn't tell us something more about a quality of any lens wide open.
 
Thanks for this Evin. I have the 50mm 1.4 G in my Amazon cart already. Your review clinches it for me.
 
Thanks Evin. You mentioned the M series ... but have you evaluated the Leica Summilux-R 35, 50, and 80mm? How do they compare? Another stellar wide open performer I hear is the entire Leica S line, though they are "slow" in the 35mm realm at only f2.5 ... but for MF lenses they are super fast and everything I've heard about them (including the charts) speaks to them being some of the best still lenses ever made. Their downsides, apart from speed, are limited range of focal lengths, insane price ($5-7,000 per lens) and scarce availability.

Anyway, thanks again for posting this, I always thought Canon L glass was superior to Nikon and was going to go with Canon glass on the Epic, but now you've pretty much convinced me to go with this set whenever I need AF lenses.

I hope these can be obtained given all that's going on with supply for high-end camera gear.

Anthony
 
Thanks again for the review Evin! I always love reading your thoughts/review.
I'd also be interested in your thoughts on the Leica R's. Though I think Anthony is confused as the 'summilux' denotes f1.4's as the largest aperture. I do believe the he's referring to the "elmarit's". In either case I've been interested in getting leicas, I'm sure we've all heard of the van diemen lenses that were converted from leicas.
There's just something about a manual aperture (built into the lens) that does it for me.

But all in all I've always loved Nikon glass. I use ai-s lenses on my 7d haha
 
Thanks Evin. I have a serious love affair with Nikon glass - even if I'm sorta trapped into Canon right now. You know, looking at that little lineup, it occurs to me that, with the addition of another two or three fast lenses, Nikon could have a worthy set of alternative primes on it's hands. Red's new cameras open this stuff up even more to motion work. Come on Nikon. Give us a 14, 18 and a 135 at 1.4. I double dog dare ya!
 
Come on Nikon. Give us a 14, 18 and a 135 at 1.4. I double dog dare ya!

Oh man. If ANY still lens manufacturer would produce those focal lengths at f1.4, it would be very difficult for me to justify buying cinema glass for the DSMC cameras.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #20
I'd be happy if they just did the "G" treatment to the already stellar 105 and 135mm F2 DC lenses. As for a 14 or 18mm I'm perfectly happy with the 14-24, at those wide focal lengths 2.8 is fine for me.

I've not had much experience with Leica R lenses but from what I've seen they are also stellar performers but considerably bigger than the M series lenses. Same with the S line, extraordinary performance but I had a hard enough time affording my M9 kit, an S2 is just a little out of my range with Epic coming.
 
Back
Top