Marcos, I can't answer that fully, so maybe someone else can chime in. I have a View Factor plate and it only shows voltage. That's ok with me, as I've only used voltage for about 20 years or so, and I'm comfortable with that. However, even for my voltage, it becomes a combined voltage when they link up... so say I have 12.0 volts left (and it's dead at 11.5), I add a battery to the stack, it now will say (typically) 14.5 or higher! Generally with two batteries, I get a 15.0V readout.
My hypothesis is that if you use a plate that displays the percentage, then it should work in nearly the same way.
From my experience and what I understand is the batteries work as a "collective" at that point.
Hi Curt,
My understanding, after speaking wth David, at PAG, UK, earlier today, is that the batteries are intelligent enough, to allow the current to flow through the rails of the !st battery, in a linked stack, when the reserve is low. Similarly, additionally linked low reserve batteries, allow the juice to flow through the rails and not the cells of any low reserve batteries.
Now, there is supposed to be enough reserve, in say a two battery linked stack, such that one can remove the second battery, to replace that second battery, with a fully charged battery. The above may be a software change, from previous versions...or not. At any rate, whilst Phil described a rather lengthy stack of linked batteries, that may not be as necessary, as one might think, simply by switching out the penultimate battery, on an ongoing basis. If the links of chain keep growing and the batteries are at low reserve, the intelligence allows the cells, within all low reserve batteries to be bypassed and the current to flow through as many rails as are represented by low reserve batteries. Someone, who has new product might test this out. Going to get some here in a bit, but won't be able to test, for awhile., however, David at PAG, UK was very clear on this point.
The Raptor thread is an interesting juxtaposition, as hot swap vs. linked battery power options are in play. Bearing in mind the above and after balancing the stabilizer for two linked (have to be V mount, BTW), batteries, simply replacing the penultimate battery, at low reserve status (either through camera monitor or on 9304's displays), the need for power down, given reasonable shooting times, and a swap plate are both obviated. In this scenario, a 9303, being first to the plate, would be a less expensive option, with the 9304 at the tail end. Great timing, for stabilizer Goup Buyers.
Thank you very much
Fury