Brian Merlen
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2010
- Messages
- 3,185
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 40
- Location
- Stamford CT
- Website
- vestadalux.com
I bought a used Scarlet for more then a BT Scarlet sold for a month or so later after my purchase, but who cares? I have a camera that takes the best images of my life. I haven't made a penny off the camera yet, but that's only cuz I am too busy working on someone elses Red set during the weekdays and shooting to make a reel on the weekends. Sitting around counting numbers is for accountants, what we do is make pretty images and that is all that matters. sitting here being a brat that i haven't made money yet is silly, i mean i took reducation nyc for 500 bucks and made 50k in returns. I am sure I will eventually monetize on the red as well, once the reel is in place and I have more time to work on my own shooting, but for now it sits in the box and I enjoy working with it on the weekends. its not really as bad as some people make it out to be, I used to have to use a DSLR for my reel/wkend gigs, now I am using the same sensor all these block busters are shooting on lol! i am quite happy, price savings be damned, and same with my timing. I still have a wonderful image maker, the pricing structure is irrelevant, and I will be happy to move up to Epic or Dragon as I save more
I'd be fairly annoyed if Scarlet can't upgrade to Dragon (or if the price of the upgrade makes it the same cost of an reduced price Epic) or if the price of Epic is reduced by something like %50 (which is essentially Scarlet territory.) I get that price reductions happen to electronics, but it's usually fairly incremental (~10% at a time); if you received your camera two months ago (just past the 30 day limit), it's not unreasonable if someone has yet to pay-off half their camera... That's $10-20k profit above and beyond pay for your time/services (in other words, you'd have to essentially be making $60-120k a year, per camera, on just rental revenue).
Conversely, because they've seemingly waited for the competition to announce a camera that is to be in the $22-25k price range before reducing the DSMC prices, this move appears to be a somewhat less generous offer and more of an necessity to prevent people from switching over. While it *could* just be coincidence, it certainly appears reactionary; if they weren't being forced by another camera, would RED have lowered the price? If Sony releases what is essentially a $22-25k "Alexa" or F65 with 4k+ resolution (the biggest advantage RED has above Arri), where does that leave the Epic? The only move is to reduce the price, otherwise they'll be less competitive... In my opinion it implies that RED's hand is being forced, rather than them dropping prices on a whim.
With all that in mind, I'm expecting the price to be reduced to match whatever Sony's F54k base price is (without any external recorder and whatnot)... potentially be 10% cheaper than that. If the F54k is like $25k camera but then $18k for a 4k recorder, I'd expect the Epic to be $25k and RED to hammer home the "we do 5k internally" mantra.