Alex Kiritz
Well-known member
If ADD applies to frames which haven't had the bayer pattern applied, wouldn't it make more sense for it to be stand for Advanced Dragon Decode (or something like that)?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I'll post a Dragon vs. Dragon Monochrome spectral response image monday. Its a great visual example of why the Monochrome is special with regard to tonal reproduction.
Below is the Mysterium X equivalent. - This is NOT Dragon... that image coming shortly
![]()
I'm working up my notes on Dragon Monochrome right now, so bear with me everyone. Anecdotally for now: I feel that Dragon is actually a bigger onward step from MX in Mono configuration. Workable ISO range is giant, sensor sharpness is better than 2/3rds of the glass on my shelves... Dynamic range is going to be VERY interesting to quantify - right now on an 8 bit laptop display I can't easily make a single image that easily represents everything in the raw.
Will have it on a real DSC chart soon.
Base Dragon pixel is the same , and as some mentioned the rgb filters are removed which lets a ton more light in. We also developed an entirely seperate olpf to go with the monochrome sensor to make sure the pixel pitch and optical properties were at its best. Some " other " monochrome cameras skipped that part but it makes a huge difference... Specially in terms of resolution and sharpness. The monochrome is incredibly sharp..much sharper than the normal 6k Dragon which is huge for the stills guys.
Graeme also generated a new color science for it ( as odd as that may sound ) and now he is working on porting over ADD to the monochrome which takes things to a whole other level.
The tonal range of the monochrome is something you can never match by just desaturating or using some black and white filters over a rgb image... John Marchant can talk about that...
How are you getting all the dynamic range of the dragon into a jpeg ... any views on how to compress the dynamic range? I am often going linear, then overlaying sections of the dynamic range ... seems like there is a need for a whole new "color" theory with the dragon monochrome.Here's a still frame from something I shot recently on Dragon Monochrome. Motion piece next week.
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7382/14123331423_11b24e3c1a_o.jpg
Heh cheers manCrossing my fingers for the piece its from, I did specifically shoot for motion and stills. Getting that pretty figured out now
- I'll get enough of a gap in 'other' work to finish it beginning of next week.
Various power windows help... this image isn't as dramatically wide in range as some, but it was shot ISO2000 (default) and is lovely from a noise/texture perspective.
I would say however that Dragon Monochrome is a very different beast, and more easily tamed than the MX Monochrome. MX tends towards a very flat image, doesn't respond well to very low ISO, and generally I hit it with a big curve to bring out the image... Dragon Mono is much more correct right out of the box, and its not just about having RG4 in camera.
Heh cheers manCrossing my fingers for the piece its from, I did specifically shoot for motion and stills. Getting that pretty figured out now
- I'll get enough of a gap in 'other' work to finish it beginning of next week.