- Banned
- #121
Hrvoje Simic
Banned
If I may:
You can barely tell the difference because it's a 16.7 % increase of data.
No one stated it is a necessity, sensor can provide a lot more "thickness" of the negative than the one 10:1 can capture. 5:1 for this type and efficiency of compression presents "the sweet spot", perception of which is relative to priorities. It's not just the picture detail.
There are things about this that dont make sense...RC42 is a 7.5:1 on Red MX and it looks gorgeous, amazing. In fact, even when pixel peeping on high-detail high-contrast scenes on MX I can BARELY tell a difference between RC36 and RC42, we are way into the curve of diminishing returns.
You can barely tell the difference because it's a 16.7 % increase of data.
So 7.5:1 on Epic is 60MB/s at 2:1 or 52MB/s at 2.37:1 (per Jim's post), why do you think 5:1 is a necessity? 5:1 would be the equivelent of RC63 on Red1MX and I just can't fathom why you'd want that unless you have an enormously high detail VFX shot (basically very rarely).
No one stated it is a necessity, sensor can provide a lot more "thickness" of the negative than the one 10:1 can capture. 5:1 for this type and efficiency of compression presents "the sweet spot", perception of which is relative to priorities. It's not just the picture detail.