Eric J Kosinski
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2011
- Messages
- 372
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
One thing I learned about working in local news about 10 years ago was that if a story came up about anything, it could be spun negative very quickly. RED is made in the USA, and no doubt it would be good for general press, but more than likely they would spin the story with some negative comments about lead times, backorders, software/firmware not being 100% complete, etc. I applaud the continued effort for a made in the USA product, but it is probably better that RED gets everything caught up, Scarlet X's out the door, and can show these USA made products come from a production line which is as efficient as other companies in various countries.
This is the story to the reporters, "production efficiency in the USA, bringing it back home".
This is the true story and will be told when it happens. The fact that a company decided to do something with production in the USA isn't so much the story, and neither is that they became successful, but the story is how successful they have become and how efficient. Not taking anything away from RED, but when the process speeds up, backorders are a thing of the past, the story will come out.
I make made in the USA products for film gear as well, and I am learning the effort it takes on a small scale, so I can't imagine what RED has overcome to start this. This is a completely different story, the human side of the story. Jim's story.
Jim Jannard will be IMHO one of the worlds great innovators if he isn't considered this now. It isn't just about the product and where it comes from to the reporters, but how we can compete in a global economy that makes it current news. Knowing reporters, the fallback plan is always to go negative. If RED shows there is no more negative and only positive efficiency, the story will tell itself.
This is the story to the reporters, "production efficiency in the USA, bringing it back home".
This is the true story and will be told when it happens. The fact that a company decided to do something with production in the USA isn't so much the story, and neither is that they became successful, but the story is how successful they have become and how efficient. Not taking anything away from RED, but when the process speeds up, backorders are a thing of the past, the story will come out.
I make made in the USA products for film gear as well, and I am learning the effort it takes on a small scale, so I can't imagine what RED has overcome to start this. This is a completely different story, the human side of the story. Jim's story.
Jim Jannard will be IMHO one of the worlds great innovators if he isn't considered this now. It isn't just about the product and where it comes from to the reporters, but how we can compete in a global economy that makes it current news. Knowing reporters, the fallback plan is always to go negative. If RED shows there is no more negative and only positive efficiency, the story will tell itself.