Chad Peter
Well-known member
Totally different feel tho...
Which falls closer in line with the look of the 35 & 50mm summicrons?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Totally different feel tho...
Thoughts on the 80mm Summilux vs. 90mm Summicron APO? If you had your pick...
Which falls closer in line with the look of the 35 & 50mm summicrons?
More in line with the 28mm Elmarit-R V2 E55 or especially the 50mm Summilux-R V3 E60...
I would say 90 APO hands down.. I've had both 90 APO & 80 LUX. I had the 90 APO first & got the 80 lUX to build a super speed set, ended up selling my 80 LUX to Mark M. The 80 just doesn't inspire confidence wide open to me, I would have to end up stopping it down to f2 get acceptable sharpness & at the APO is just as sharp if not sharper & is much better as far as CA. The copy of the 80 LUX was in great shape btw.
Thanks David! As boring as it may sound I could capture clouds all day long.
Some of this footage is making its way into an upcoming MV. Will post the link hopefully in a week or so.
Chad, great tough question. I've gone back and forth a few times and eventually decided both were requirements![]()
I find them both amazing/unique but very different. It probably boils down to the type of set you want – more vintage or modern, and the benefits/differences that go along with each. There are many reasons to go either way. While they're both all-Leica, the 80mm F1.4 Lux is the ultimate Mandler design from the late '70s (apparently his own favorite of the many lenses he designed) and full of character/bloom wide open but closed down it becomes one the sharpest vintage lenses available anywhere.
The 90mm F2 APO is a 2002 design with modern optical corrections that captures a more consistent well-corrected image across the frame and all apertures. The body design is much more modern too with more butter focus action. But if you prefer the character that comes along with vintage glass especially in out of focus areas, the 90 may seem a bit 'boring' by comparison (i.e. rather evenly blurred like most modern glass), whereas the 80 is full of character there. To complicate things, late 80 1.4s render colors that more closely resembles the 90 APO's in hue and saturation than an early 80 1.4 as there were various color updates over time.
Depending on the desired look I'll reach for one over the other. For instance a few weeks ago on a Vietnam-related docu scene with an older male talking head, the director wanted all the background foliage 'to disappear' and flatter him with a hint of softness but without missing in-focus sharpness. The 80 Lux 1.4 put a huge smile on his face when he saw it on the monitor at wide open. But for cleaner, very well-corrected edge to edge performance in modern Leica rendering style, the 90mm APO is an amazing option but at a higher price.
Otherwise even the classic 90 Summicron is amazing in its own right too, along with the 90 Elmarit (and then there's the astounding 70-180 2.8 APO zoom![]()
There are just so many great Leica R lenses in this focal range, you really can't go wrong.
...
And great stills from your film Chad, I'm looking forward to it!
So I should buy both of them, is what you're saying?hahah... well, shoot.
Since you've taken the more modern Leica route, the 90 Summicron APO makes a perfect fit in your line-up.
And I agree, your classic 80 Lux was in great shape and wound up in an early '80s set I built last year![]()
Chad, great tough question. I've gone back and forth a few times and eventually decided both were requirements![]()
I find them both amazing/unique but very different. It probably boils down to the type of set you want – more vintage or modern, and the benefits/differences that go along with each. There are many reasons to go either way. While they're both all-Leica, the 80mm F1.4 Lux is the ultimate Mandler design from the late '70s (apparently his own favorite of the many lenses he designed) and full of character/bloom wide open but closed down it becomes one the sharpest vintage lenses available anywhere.
The 90mm F2 APO is a 2002 design with modern optical corrections that captures a more consistent well-corrected image across the frame and all apertures. The body design is much more modern too with more butter focus action. But if you prefer the character that comes along with vintage glass especially in out of focus areas, the 90 may seem a bit 'boring' by comparison (i.e. rather evenly blurred like most modern glass), whereas the 80 is full of character there. To complicate things, late 80 1.4s render colors that more closely resembles the 90 APO's in hue and saturation than an early 80 1.4 as there were various color updates over time.
Depending on the desired look I'll reach for one over the other. For instance a few weeks ago on a Vietnam-related docu scene with an older male talking head, the director wanted all the background foliage 'to disappear' and flatter him with a hint of softness but without missing in-focus sharpness. The 80 Lux 1.4 put a huge smile on his face when he saw it on the monitor at wide open. But for cleaner, very well-corrected edge to edge performance in modern Leica rendering style, the 90mm APO is an amazing option but at a higher price.
Welcome! I guess its all relative to which camera you have, but my thoughts would be you might wan't something on the wider end for the establishing shots. Maybe look into the different versions of the 19mm. Only other thing is the 50mm and the 60mm would be a little too close for my tastes in a three lens set. On my Raven I find myself using my 24mm quite a bit (I know its not as sharp as the 28 but I love my copy.) Also my 35mm is another favorite. So If I had to pick just three maybe 19, 35, 60 But to each their ownHi guys,
Anyway, I am thinking of actually splurging on some of these (a 3 set) for an upcoming project. Its a doco and will have a lot of the talking heads interview and macro shots of various devices for cut sequences, as well as establishing shots. I was thinking to have a wide angle for establishing perhaps Elmarit 28mm, as a normal a Lux 50mm and a 60mm Macro. I was just wondering what your guys opinions would be, am I making the right move or is there a better option(s)?
Thank you so much in advance!
Wahab
Anyway, I am thinking of actually splurging on some of these (a 3 set) for an upcoming project. Its a doco and will have a lot of the talking heads interview and macro shots of various devices for cut sequences, as well as establishing shots. I was thinking to have a wide angle for establishing perhaps Elmarit 28mm, as a normal a Lux 50mm and a 60mm Macro. I was just wondering what your guys opinions would be, am I making the right move or is there a better option(s)?