Laforet Video and New Canon Gear?

[Zack Birlew]

No, no, I wasn't singling you out Kenneth, I've been seeing these resolution comments all over the place and it's just surprising to me that people will go after these VDSLR's on that again and again. People are still buying DVX100's for crying out loud! Yet these VDSLR's are just "not good enough".

 

[Pietro Impagliazzo]

No, no, I wasn't singling you out Kenneth, I've been seeing these resolution comments all over the place and it's just surprising to me that people will go after these VDSLR's on that again and again. People are still buying DVX100's for crying out loud! Yet these VDSLR's are just "not good enough".

What's your point?

 

[Grady Wilson]

did anybody notice that Canon forced Vincent to take the movie down?

 

[Sanjin Jukic]

It's been taken down by...(???)...using Canon Balls...

http://www.vimeo.com/7152063

 

[Iannis Holwech]

Way funny and true, response to the fact that Canon asked Laforet to take down the video;
Fake Chuck Westfall; On Canon Taking Down Nocturne :tongue_smilie:

 

[Ketch Rossi]

This was probably in part do to the fact of some criticism of the image quality, so looks like LaForret might need a little more playing around with the 1D IV before shooting something to post.

 

[MichaelHalsell]

Is the white wall meant to look like this.... ?

Yes, this is intentional. This is an in-camera horror effect Canon has included at no charge. Saves time in post

 

[Jim Klatt]

The phrase sucks balls is an offshoot of sucks c*ck, which is derogatory against the gay community. I wish people would show a little more maturity.

 

[jaadgy akanni]

looks like LaForret might need a little more playing around with the 1D IV before shooting something to post.

...and while he's at it, maybe he can make it look less videoy
The D90 may look worse than the Canon on paper, but it looks way more filmic, IMHO.

 

[Rick Darge]

The phrase sucks balls is an offshoot of sucks c*ck, which is derogatory against the gay community. I wish people would show a little more maturity.

Just wondering, how is that specifically derogatory against the gay community exactly? Women also suck c*ck, yes?

 

[Liam Hall]

The phrase sucks balls is an offshoot of sucks c*ck, which is derogatory against the gay community. I wish people would show a little more maturity.

Wrong thread Jim. You need to post this in the "Why Canon Sucks Balls" thread. But yes, I agree it is both immature and derogatory. I can think of about twenty similar titles they could replace it with, which whilst still being immature would only be insulting to dogs, red necks and caravan owners...

 

[Pietro Impagliazzo]

The phrase sucks balls is an offshoot of sucks c*ck, which is derogatory against the gay community. I wish people would show a little more maturity.

Ok, weird question... Why against gays?!

Are they the only ones that practice oral sex?

I guess you're a little biased on this accusation.

Wrong thread Jim. You need to post this in the "Why Canon Sucks Balls" thread. But yes, I agree it is both immature and derogatory. I can think of about twenty similar titles they could replace it with, which whilst still being immature would only be insulting to dogs, red necks and caravan owners...

LOL

Just wondering, how is that specifically derogatory against the gay community exactly? Women also suck c*ck, yes?

ROFL, didn't see your post.
This guy is obviously clueless or trying to find something to get offended by?

 

[Eddy Robinson]

Ok, weird question... Why against gays?

In the USA, such an insult implies homosexuality. It's not very logical, but insults rarely are. Most Americans would read it this way. However someone interprets it, it's needlessly impolite.

 

[Jannard]

Not worthy of reduser.

Jim

 

[Jarred Land]

Something in the water tonight.. thread closed.