Nick Vera
Well-known member
To me this is not a DR test. It is an image recovery test if you under/over expose of X amount of stops. And yes, it shows without question that Arri is great at that. But again, it's not DR as in "how many stops of DR you have in a correctly exposed image at the native/nominal/voodoo magic ISO setting".
And I agree with what Karim said : they are both good cameras. Just different flavors.
(but when looking at a lot of DR tests, RED's usually top more than 14 stops BUT Arri's have a more balanced dynamic range which make all those stops more easily usable)
Once I showed your Monstro VS Alexa LF video to someone claiming that RED color science was crap and that the skin tones were always to green. On one of the shots, it's actually the LF skin tones that look a bit more green than RED's. His answer was : "the guy obviously mislabelled the 2 images it's impossible to get those results otherwise"...
So even if I do think that the two cameras are equal in qualities and are just two differents flavors, I think that some are really stuborn. ^_^
1. I believe you can pretty much match any camera to any other camera if the data is there. Yedlin talks about it all the time.
2. I think every camera sensor is going to have its negatives and positives when it comes down to the quality and how many photosites the sensor has, as well as the aspects the manufacturer prioritizes in their cameras.