- Banned
- #141
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
there must be reasons why RED can't offer the option of metric or imperial, or better yet, and in keeping with the company's innovative spirit, both
Hey Greg… love you man.
But let's all face it one time for all:
This sucks big time for us in metric land, and there is nothing any of you can say,(be it smart or not so), that would make us feel better about this.
If it was the other way around you guys from Brooklin to L.A. would be yelling so loud we couldn't here ourselves playing cards in france.
WE NEED YOUR SYMPATHY AND SOLIDARITY NOT AGAINST RED BUT BECAUSE OUR CAUSE IS A JUST ONE.
Yours
Emmanuel
If I'm handholding a 435/535, I think it would be really strange/irresponsible to not hold onto the handles and hold by the matte box instead. I'm confused by your post. And I'm a professional. Can you explain what you mean?
I really shouldn't be telling you this, but I heard the reason for all the coyness regarding metric/imperial is because Red will be rolling out Red Units of Measurement at NAB. If you're changing the world, why not start with the basics?
The most common linear measurement will be the Red Hand, which is somewhere between a foot and a decimeter. Red Hands will be broken up into smaller units called Scarlets. A Scarlet, conveniently, will be equivalent to a millimeter so you can simply ask for a 50 Scarlet lens and people will know what you mean. Larger units comparable to miles/kilometers are rumoured to be called the Jim. Days will be called 'Soons" months will be called "Eventuallys", and very small units of time are of course Nattresses.
(Sorry. Cabin fever may be setting in...)
No problem, thanks :wink:Sorry to all my French brothers if I offended them in regards to their homeland lenses. I actually own a very nice Ang. 12-120 and love it.
Peace
Why freak out about this particular lens. It is what it is, and life is too short to stress over the little details.
Yes...hold onto the matte box. No handles. Still confused? You have much better control. The handles actually increase the weight on the front end and limit your mobility (not much) but enough if you get yourself in tight quarters. Thats why so many operators say..."yea...just rest your elbows against your chest...etc." Just like not using a pan handle on a fluid head and holding right onto the mag (like most) professional operators. Better mobility and more at one with the camera. Don't worry...a dp won't hold it against you. Give it a shot...maybe it's for you...maybe not.
Yes...hold onto the matte box. No handles. Still confused? You have much better control. The handles actually increase the weight on the front end and limit your mobility (not much) but enough if you get yourself in tight quarters. Thats why so many operators say..."yea...just rest your elbows against your chest...etc." Just like not using a pan handle on a fluid head and holding right onto the mag (like most) professional operators. Better mobility and more at one with the camera. Don't worry...a dp won't hold it against you. Give it a shot...maybe it's for you...maybe not.
![]()
Listen to "the jesus".
![]()
Listen to "the jesus".
Ian...once again to my rescue. Is that Chris Doyle??? When I worked with him, he had those same silly bags for hand held.
How about that pint...or liter of beer?
Before I was a DP I worked with a whole bunch of other DP's and never saw this once. But I WILL indeed give it a try, especially since I have done the mag thing when it's on sticks.
I hope I'm not TOO set in my ways, it's only been 13 years after all. :turned: