Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

I found a monster....

So who will be the first to post a full resolution images from this gem , wide open , of a brick wall or something else that can informally show how it does all the way to the edges ?
I know, I know, who cares about a brick wall, we shoot people.... but having only the center 1/3 of the image in focus in the center is not the only thing too look at.
 
Tamron 90mm SP F2.5 macro manual focus is better. At least compared to the Vivitar sample I had. Both plenty sharp - just liked the Tamron colors and contrast better.

There is a version "2" that's made by another company that's not as good as the tokina made version. Same name same markings, different glass.
 
The only place I've seen the 1:1 adapters sold separately is on eBay, usually for around $75. There isn't a Canon EOS native one since this lens predates the EOS system, so you'd have to get an adapter to change one of the other mounts to EOS.
 
It has interchangeable mounts too. You can swap out the rear component on it and convert between Nikon, Canon, Pentax, etc.. mounts. You don't need to screw with Novoflex or other adapters, unless you really want to.

Could someone elaborate on this? What is the underlying mount when the rear element is removed?
 
It's proprietary. Their approach was to calculate the lenses for a bit longer flange distance and than offer exchangeable adapters (hence Adaptall) for specific cameras. I wish we had this from others…

I have a C/Y version and a Minolta SR version for my 85mm 2.5 macro, so I can use it for both of my lens collections. It needs some color correction in both cases, of course, being a bit greener than the others.

BTW, the adapters can still be found on Ebay for decent money, just found a mint C/Y version for a friend for less then 20 Euro.
 
So who will be the first to post a full resolution images from this gem , wide open , of a brick wall or something else that can informally show how it does all the way to the edges ?
I know, I know, who cares about a brick wall, we shoot people.... but having only the center 1/3 of the image in focus in the center is not the only thing too look at.

Here's a quick test I did when i got the lens. Shot wide open:
 
Funny this thread came back to life...

I just used the lens yesterday and FELL IN LOVE AGAIN.

Its magic in a black tube. will post a shot soon.
 
I've got a wide angle, macro and Tele zoom Vivitar. I Love 'em all :)
 
So who will be the first to post a full resolution images from this gem , wide open , of a brick wall or something else that can informally show how it does all the way to the edges ?
I know, I know, who cares about a brick wall, we shoot people.... but having only the center 1/3 of the image in focus in the center is not the only thing too look at.
I just got a D800 and can put together a pixel peeping test soon. I live in earthquake country so brick walls aren't that common, but I'm sure I can come up with something decent. I have noticed that there's a bit of CA when wide open at very high resolutions, but it's completely gone by f/4.

In the mean time, here's a 100% crop from the D800 at f/4 (with noise reduction but no sharpening)
http://www.redwoodcoastfilm.com/photos/frog.png

Taken from this:
frog.jpg
 
Last edited:
If anyone really wants to scrutinize this lens, I have a couple RAW files from the D800 at f/2.5 and f/5.6 of a woven rug. It looks like corner sharpness suffers at f/2.5, but otherwise it's pretty outstanding throughout the aperture range.

bokina.zip
 
Just bought one on your recommend; thank you for clueing me on this!

Mike
 
Back
Top