Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Hint...

Pocket 'Holgraphic' (Laser) Projector...

- No need for VR
- No need for AR
- Display device of the future. Take it anywhere..
- Ofcourse Glorious RED quality pictures in your Face.
- it is life-like. And you can add a 'virtual layer to that'
what possibilities that gives.. That is a whole new level of AR. REDreality!

Oh...and yes.. you can connect your phone to it... but a bit obsolute, because it is build in.

Something across those lines...


Now waiting for Jannard to respond: 'Close....'

:thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
That's exactly what I was thinking....
 
What July the 7th announcement Bob?
 
This is just a guess... but... given that jarred seems to have been posting a few "you know... Apple is really stepping up their game" posts on this forum and on Facebook for the past few months..

My money is on a RED that fits in your pocket running iOS with native Apple integration so everyone, young and old alike, can bask in the true glory of what it is to work with .r3d files...

Apple deals with the cell phone/interface... RED deals with the images and compression.

Both companies secure the next few generations of cinematographers by getting the tech into the hands of kids/families... peace out arri and avid.

This is one of the best guesses I've seen yet. If it's not a RED action camera, it'll be this.
 
What July the 7th announcement Bob?

Wayne, I think he was being location specific in that at your location it will be July 7 when it is still July 6 here.
 
I think the only way it is a camera is if it's a huge technical leap in consumer-friendly cameras (like a souped up iPhone) or something innovative and different that hasn't been done before. But, it's definitely tailored more to everyone, so I don't think it will a Black Magic Pocket-sized 5K Red Raw camera or mirrorless camera.
 
Can we all agree that it's not a camera? I mean it's obviously not a camera right?

if it is a camera, then it is probably a new definition of a camera that is likely to be part of something new that different people will find parts of, useful in their lives.

There... I think that is ambiguous enough and covers a large enough area to possibly give me a "win" of a sort for guessing what it is when announced. '-)
 
This is just a guess... but... given that jarred seems to have been posting a few "you know... Apple is really stepping up their game" posts on this forum and on Facebook for the past few months..

My money is on a RED that fits in your pocket running iOS with native Apple integration so everyone, young and old alike, can bask in the true glory of what it is to work with .r3d files...

Apple deals with the cell phone/interface... RED deals with the images and compression.

Both companies secure the next few generations of cinematographers by getting the tech into the hands of kids/families... peace out arri and avid.

(However... IF it is augmented reality glasses, then Jim.. if you're reading this... we work exclusively in human/machine interfaces and would love a crack at developing for them. www.ihmc.us )

Amazing.. "RED X APPLE" will be simply amazing! So invincible. It will rule the world!!
Steve Jobs can finally rest in proud.
 
This is just a guess... but... given that jarred seems to have been posting a few "you know... Apple is really stepping up their game" posts on this forum and on Facebook for the past few months..

My money is on a RED that fits in your pocket running iOS with native Apple integration so everyone, young and old alike, can bask in the true glory of what it is to work with .r3d files...

Apple deals with the cell phone/interface... RED deals with the images and compression.

Both companies secure the next few generations of cinematographers by getting the tech into the hands of kids/families... peace out arri and avid.

(However... IF it is augmented reality glasses, then Jim.. if you're reading this... we work exclusively in human/machine interfaces and would love a crack at developing for them. www.ihmc.us )

Jim has stated that he hates glasses, but of course a workable business plan could change that.

If it is a precise sync'able live "realtime precise world reconstruction" like Tango, only that it works, that would be interesting, but actually conditionally so.

I like the multi-sensor capture patent, but that doesn't seem to be within the "you can buy many" scope, and why would you?

Apple was admireably pragmatic in the ARkit solution. "Do stuff that works.
I like that.
And that could be a place where RED and Apple could work together, but it has little value without Unreal or Unity in there in some non-felt way.
And for RED users, it would not have any real effect unless it was sync'able to the main camera. And that brings so many extra issues outside the track and composite that my head starts to hurt slightly.


But from the things Jim says he is not interested in, it narrows down the scope significantly.

Well world peace is probably not uninteresting, but outside the scope.
 
5) Adjustable prescription correction per wearer with the ability to adjust focus to the item you are looking at (eye tracker based)



I like the way Blair is thinking. Jim knows glasses. Jim knows cameras. Jim knows design. Must be a way to combine this knowledge base into some kind of super-specs that everyone can wear. I like #5. Bionic eyeballs would be pretty cool, and way overdue, since the $6,000,000 man had one, back in the 70s.


that alone would change the world for everybody. And consume entire industries at a gulp.

I'm going with glasses with self-adjusting prescriptions that can give you better than 20-20, see way off in the distance and better close vision, for super accurate focus pulls. That's something for everybody and affordable to everybody.

also fits my original "health" theme, but more aligned with the Jim knowledge base....


on a different note, it is rather amusing to read Forbes referring to Jim as a "Hollywood darling" - whatever it is that he is planning, it better help him hoist that "leader of the rebellion" flag....this "darling" business needs to go!
 
Apple was admireably pragmatic in the ARkit solution. "Do stuff that works.
I like that.
And that could be a place where RED and Apple could work together, but it has little value without Unreal or Unity in there in some non-felt way.
And for RED users, it would not have any real effect unless it was sync'able to the main camera. And that brings so many extra issues outside the track and composite that my head starts to hurt slightly.


But from the things Jim says he is not interested in, it narrows down the scope significantly.

Well world peace is probably not uninteresting, but outside the scope.


I think it would absolutely have a huge impact on red users... think about how much easier life would be if the .r3d workflow was totally ubiquitous. Sure all the major NLE's already support it.. but... imagine if high schoolers were making skateboard videos with pocket REDS... the amount of third party R&D that would go into new ways/plug-ins/etc to work with .r3d files would explode.

Literally... given all of the different formats over the years I've had to work with and understand... I want nothing less than the entire video world to natively exist in .r3d format. From capturing to deliverable... .r3d files are far superior to any other video codec/format I've personally ever dealt with...

It's a pipe dream.. I know.. but.. imagine how RAD it would be if the tables were turned and people had to convert their .mov files into .r3d to upload them to YouTube. Browsers naitvely supporting .r3d streaming playback.

Instead of us having to handicap our footage to play well with inferior tech, make everyone else have to step up their game by raising the bar at the beginning of the "learning chain" for every future cinematographer... their parents phones.
 
Last edited:
Jim, Jarred, can you share an estimate price range so we get ready? :)
 
What if it was a pair of multi-function "glasses" that combined several features?
1) Adjustable transmission of light, ala photo-responsive glasses, but using nano tech
2) Can be used to view your cell phone screen, perhaps over BT5?
3) Offers AR functionality akin to what Hololens was aiming at
4) Power and processing via tether to a small device roughly the size of a smartphone
5) Adjustable prescription correction per wearer with the ability to adjust focus to the item you are looking at (eye tracker based)

One pair of spectacles to rule them all

Cheers - #19

BTW: I'd like to reserve number 19, just so it's easy to remember ;-)

Only idea I have seen so far that makes sense, given all we know.
 
Back
Top