Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Has anyone compared RED 18-85 to RPP's?

michael zaletel

michael zaletel

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Messages
2,541
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Just curious if anyone that owns both the 18-85 and the full set of Red Pro Primes has ever shot the same subject in same light at same exact focal lengths and posted image comparisons or footage?

Please advise,

-michael zaletel
 
compare

compare

michael zaletel said:
Just curious if anyone that owns both the 18-85 and the full set of Red Pro Primes has ever shot the same subject in same light at same exact focal lengths and posted image comparisons or footage?

Please advise,

-michael zaletel
Click to expand...
Since they are all made by Sigma they should have the same look:devil:
Disclosure:
Like most people here I have no clue about the origins of these lenses:
just f***king with you:thumbsup:
 
If time and portability were not a factor, wouldn't the 18mm prime give you a better image than the 18-85 zoom at 18mm?

-michael zaletel
 
michael zaletel said:
Right. So anyone know of any comparison images I can look at?

-michael zaletel
Click to expand...

Nothing you can download. From my experience primes are always a better image quality than zooms, less glass to go through. I have the 18mm RPP, it's a lovely lens.
 
Theoretically..the prime lens should be abit sharper and more contrasty.
In reality..the difference is probably not too noticeable...if at all.

But surely there are people here who have access to both and could
shoot a real world object test.
Or 2 different people could shoot a test chart to compare...any volunteers..
 
David Collard said:
One thing for sure, The M-X technology has made the 18-85 an even better lens,
not mention the power of FLUT™™™™.
Click to expand...

And further more now my pet Chupacabra can exsanguinate your wimpy Unicorn.

Just do your own test and see what works for you. Any lens has strong and weak points - many of them are subjective.

Matt Uhry
www.mattuhry.com
 
I think the 18-85 was deemed to not cover 5k on epic, that's what turned me off the trail, otherwise i'd be coveting that lens.
 
One is shot with RPP 25mm, the other with the Red Pro Zoom 18-85mm.
I can't tell them apart anymore, I guess that's a rather good news.
test_1.jpg

test_2.jpg
 
Well, what those screen grabs tell me is that the RPPs and the 18-85 zoom are similar enough so as to be practically indistinguishable. Which makes the zoom one helluva bargain, as long as you can live with the size & weight of the zoom, and the slower T stop.
 
I wanna see the 17-50mm, if it is this close THAT is gonna be the real bargain. Small, light, plenty fast for M-X, and a helu'va lotta goodly-ness in the IQ.
 
As I said this before, Zooms and Primes, have posed issues and difference in their individual Physical and unique capabilities, this have dramatically changed in the present days in more then one way, but there remain distinct and inevitable differences, for which one must choose one or the other.

IQ, Zooms vs. Primes, same speed, same Aperture, becomes less and less distinguishable especially so with lenses such as the RED PRO line.

Primes:
Faster
Lighter
Sharper then Zooms
More Expensive to get the same range as a Zoom
Primes have both Qualities and defects, more control then Zooms, but not something that any Viewer will ever notice.

Zooms:
Slower
Heavier
Not as Sharp as Primes
Cheaper when compared to a set of Primes needed to cover the same range
Zooms offer the flexibility that Primes can not
Zooms offer the possibility to Zoom in and or out, instead of a needed Dolly when using Primes, but this gives however a different effect to the end result

The list goes on and on, so each must be chosen accordingly, if Weight, Size and speed is not a problem, but money is, the Zoom is the winner all the way, especially with the RPZ 18-85, and the RPZ 17-50.
Flexibility remains by far the best quality of the zoom, especially when in situations were you just simply can not afford time to change Focal in order to get a shot, in wild life and documentary particularly.
 
Emmanuel Cambier said:
Well, upon further inspection, I can now tell them apart anew…
Click to expand...

Thank you..Emmanuel for this...this test really puts the zoom to the
test as it has alot of fine detail with all the grass and leaves.
Looks like the sun was different as the shadows are different...
might be interesting to try again at same exact time.

Yes..the prime has abit more contrast and sharpness. Enough
of a difference...that might have to change my zoom plans.
Wouldn't hesitate for zoom on anything other than a feature.
 
Emmanuel Cambier said:
One is shot with RPP 25mm, the other with the Red Pro Zoom 18-85mm.
I can't tell them apart anymore, I guess that's a rather good news.
Click to expand...

Thanks so much for doing this Emmanuel.

The top image is clearly better and can be made to look like the bottom image if necessary but not the other way around. Is the top image the RPP?

I agree it seems the back focus is off, when was the last time it was adjusted, did you use a focus hook, measuring tape and a pro focus chart? What kind of filtration was in front of the lens on these two shots and what aperture did you use?

Thanks again,

-michael zaletel
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top