Bill Stengel
Member
No Gio Scope for Scarlet Dragon?
*frowny face*
*frowny face*
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
No Gio Scope for Scarlet Dragon?
*frowny face*
Gio Scope is also in the Beta Firmware for the Scarlet Dragon![]()
I thought the exposure tool (the one with the purple / green / red colors) was based on the RAW signal ? But it seems to change when I change my ISO, so it's kind of pointless... Is that normal behaviour ?
Thanks, good to know !There was a bug in 5.3.9, it's fixed in 5.3.16
Actually, I just installed 5.3.16 and it's still the same : when I change ISO, the exposure tool changes too. I can understand that the green part changes, but shouldn't the red and purple parts stay the same, isn't that the point of that tool ? Shouldn't the exposure tool be based on the RAW image, independently of metadata ?There was a bug in 5.3.9, it's fixed in 5.3.16
Actually, I just installed 5.3.16 and it's still the same : when I change ISO, the exposure tool changes too. I can understand that the green part changes, but shouldn't the red and purple parts stay the same, isn't that the point of that tool ? Shouldn't the exposure tool be based on the RAW image, independently of metadata ?
I also just tried adjusting the luma curve (love the new interface btw !), and same thing, changes on curves have an impact on the exposure tool. But not on the Gio scope.
Thanks![]()
The intent is to preserve the raw information, however the false color is impacted by the curves applied to the image. Using the RLF curve will preserve the raw information best.
But isn't the point of the exposure tool to be independent of any grading curves or ISO ? When I use this tool, what I really want to know is : what parts of the recorded (RAW) image are really clipped, and what parts are really underexposed, regardless of the ISO and/or curve I selected. You seem to be doing exactly this with the new Gio-scope, so it has to be possible, it is not a limitation within the camera. Could this be done with the exposure tool too ? I think that's a really important point, otherwise it could be quite misleading...The intent is to preserve the raw information, however the false color is impacted by the curves applied to the image. Using the RLF curve will preserve the raw information best.
But isn't the point of the exposure tool to be independent of any grading curves or ISO ? When I use this tool, what I really want to know is : what parts of the recorded (RAW) image are really clipped, and what parts are really underexposed, regardless of the ISO and/or curve I selected. You seem to be doing exactly this with the new Gio-scope, so it has to be possible, it is not a limitation within the camera. Could this be done with the exposure tool too ? I think that's a really important point, otherwise it could be quite misleading...