Tom Lowe
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2007
- Messages
- 8,520
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
After a week with Dragon, here are some thoughts and observations:
* Dragon is a natural progression from Epic MX. The camera looks and weighs the same, and operates the same. If you know how to use an Epic, then you know how to use a Dragon.
* The biggest difference you will notice when you first fire up the camera is that you will be able to see new things in the frame -- details in the shadows, skies that should be blown out, but are not. Things like streetlights are handled much better by this sensor.
* Once you start shooting 6K, going back to shooting 4K feels like a massive compromise. When you switch Dragon from 6K to 4K, for example, you can notice a massive quality difference, even on a small monitor. Shooting 4K Bayer feels like shooting 1080p to me now. I don't want to do it.
* Once DPs and directors start looking at actual 6K frames shot on good glass, there will be no going back to 2K or 1080p. Those days are over. Shoot Dragon or shoot film, but don't shoot 1080p. 1080p is a big mistake that will be apparent in a few years when people want to watch their favorite content on their 4K monitors and TVs. They will be out of luck with anything shot 2k or 1080p. Uprezzing is bullshit. Get it in camera.
* Red-dot back reflections seems to be gone.
* On Epic I never shoot over ISO 1000 in extreme low light. On Dragon, I am comfortable shooting ISO 2500, maybe ISO 3200 in extreme low light.
* If there is one downside to the Dragon, to me, it is the high compression required to shoot at high framerates. I realize that Graeme is a genius and that compression technology gets better and better each year, but I get nervous when compression ratios go above 10:1.
* Dragon is a natural progression from Epic MX. The camera looks and weighs the same, and operates the same. If you know how to use an Epic, then you know how to use a Dragon.
* The biggest difference you will notice when you first fire up the camera is that you will be able to see new things in the frame -- details in the shadows, skies that should be blown out, but are not. Things like streetlights are handled much better by this sensor.
* Once you start shooting 6K, going back to shooting 4K feels like a massive compromise. When you switch Dragon from 6K to 4K, for example, you can notice a massive quality difference, even on a small monitor. Shooting 4K Bayer feels like shooting 1080p to me now. I don't want to do it.
* Once DPs and directors start looking at actual 6K frames shot on good glass, there will be no going back to 2K or 1080p. Those days are over. Shoot Dragon or shoot film, but don't shoot 1080p. 1080p is a big mistake that will be apparent in a few years when people want to watch their favorite content on their 4K monitors and TVs. They will be out of luck with anything shot 2k or 1080p. Uprezzing is bullshit. Get it in camera.
* Red-dot back reflections seems to be gone.
* On Epic I never shoot over ISO 1000 in extreme low light. On Dragon, I am comfortable shooting ISO 2500, maybe ISO 3200 in extreme low light.
* If there is one downside to the Dragon, to me, it is the high compression required to shoot at high framerates. I realize that Graeme is a genius and that compression technology gets better and better each year, but I get nervous when compression ratios go above 10:1.