George Butterfield
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2009
- Messages
- 875
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
While we're at it, we might as well get another name for 'Filmmaker'!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Peronally I get more worried the more the Dit actually have to deal with. Check files and duplicate copies is enough the rest should only be done if there is time. As I think a film set is not the best location for dealing with renders etc. Also I think producers and DIT's think post facilites charge a shitiload for making proxies, syncing sound etc... well those days are far gone, we do that kind of stuff in our office for just about every other project and I think I have not charged anything for it since the mx came out...
Its simply part of the service, so send us the source and we deal with it. If your post place demands the material on a silver plate, then possibly so that its not the right place to go, lol.
So long as my data has been checked, and backed up on minimum 3 drives minites after I have shot it. Then you can call yourselves anything you want.
Also, perhaps it is about time to drop the "digital".
Then he or she would become an "it"...
Then he or she would become an "it"...
Funniest line I've read today! I needed that laugh, David.Then he or she would become an "it"...
I believe IA Local 600 would have something to say about that. I'd yield to them when it comes to job descriptions and definitions.Firstly, the DIT job needs an updated definition. Everyone seems to have their own idea of what a DIT does. To me, "digital imaging technician" suggests a person who's in charge of imaging right from planning to post-production. That is semantics of course, it doesn't matter what they're called, but at least a majority of people in the profession should agree on the job's responsibilities! Also, perhaps it is about time to drop the "digital".