Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Can't Stop Shooting!

Few from the other night pulled from 48fps - STH OLPF, iso1280, 100mm f2.8, 1/96th shutter.

11_zps363faf4b.jpg


6_zps0de5ea87.jpg


2_zps823eee3c.jpg


3_zps2c1590f8.jpg
 
Prepping to dive back into shooting more of a continuing feature film this week. So got to share a hint of footage I'm reviewing...

STH OLPF, iso2000 w/DEB, 35mm f2.8

faroff_dark_zps591114de.png


I just love playing in the dark!
 
Joseph Coleman said:
I have to be honest with you, These images looks so much better in regards to noise compared to so many other posts I've seen. I would have guessed you were using the V1 for sure. Your 2000 iso shots look very usable in my opinion. And I had written off 2000iso with the v2 olpf. Either you got really luck with a good sensor or your doing something very right. Keep it up man...I hope my dragon performs like this!
Click to expand...

I agree. I just can't get clean images like this, certainly not at 2000 ISO. Would it be possible to send an R3D of those 2000 ISO images so I can look at the scopes?
 
due to the nature of the project, i can't share any r3d's, but that shot is very much lit. KinoFlo just out of frame, so it maybe gives the illusion it's darker than it was in person.

however, we've continued shooting and got some lovely images going... these are iso800, STH OLPF, 6K WS.

nohope_zps4eddf963.png


awakened_zps3cea640a.png


happy shooting!
 
Don't forget to mention whether you're using ADD for these stills or not. If you are, noise is visibly reduced using that method so people may have the wrong expectations for their R3D's...
 
Matt Ryan said:
Don't forget to mention whether you're using ADD for these stills or not. If you are, noise is visibly reduced using that method so people may have the wrong expectations for their R3D's...
Click to expand...

oh for sure. def have DEB on the higher iso's, but i've yet to use ADD much. i'm sure the down-sampling helps too.
 
Sean Cruser said:
oh for sure. def have DEB on the higher iso's, but i've yet to use ADD much. i'm sure the down-sampling helps too.
Click to expand...

Cool, just wanted to make sure.
 
Other night was able to finally look at some footage for a project I was DP on back in October. Can't wait to see the full thing when it's finished. These are straight outta camera with DC/RG4.

STH OLPF, iso400, 24mm f2.8.

A001_C019_10253J0000000_zps74b0e4b8.jpg


A002_C022_1025JV0001959_zps6db1efa2.jpg
 
While we were all frothing at the mouth over any more details on upcoming Weapon upgrades, I was shooting one of my very favorite subjects: my super cute nephew.

STH OLPF, iso's ranging from 500 to 1280.

tom4_zps13201fdc.jpg


smiles_zps0fa6b877.jpg


tom1_zpsde2197c8.jpg


cutie_zps26a0ff9d.jpg


Motion highlights soon to come :)
 
I enjoy these little breaks from serious filmmaking.


Cut in Premiere CC and colored in Speedgrade.

STH OLPF, iso800-1280, with focal ranges from 24, 35, 50, 85, 100.
 
This is film making Sean, some of your most important work. Priceless...

Sean Cruser said:
I enjoy these little breaks from serious filmmaking.


Cut in Premiere CC and colored in Speedgrade.

STH OLPF, iso800-1280, with focal ranges from 24, 35, 50, 85, 100.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top