Candles in Manhattan

[Mark L. Pederson]

Shot tons of stuff today - way too much fun - will post footage and 4K tiffs soon - here's a low res teaser - one practical and some candles - that's it -

 

[Evan Owen]

Oh man.... oh man....

That's crazy.

I hope those tiffs don't take too long or my refresh button's going to wear out...

 

[Keith Alan Morris]

badass, offhollywood.

 

[Jeff Kilgroe]

neat-o

I want to see it in motion...

 

[Geoff Reisner]

Beautiful shot... I want motion too

 

[Larry McKee]

Unbelievable. It's unreal how well the satellite dish pops out from the clouds/haze.

 

[Roberto B]

Beautiful shot... I want motion too

i second the motion.. :clown2:

 

[Geoff Reisner]

Unbelievable. It's unreal how well the satellite dish pops out from the clouds/haze.

Not too long ago, I remember driving at night and looking at how the dark tree line would be separated from the night sky...and I'd think to myself, "I can't wait till I've got a camera that can do that."

 

[Larry McKee]

Mark, what ASA rating did you use for this shot?

 

[Casey Green]

good stuff, thanks.

You guys are having way too much fun! Wish I could afford a camera.

keep up the good work!

 

[Mark L. Pederson]

Mark, what ASA rating did you use for this shot?

500 - opened up the shutter

 

[jbeale]

So shutters more than 180 are enabled now? Is the shutter close to 1/24 ? I know it can't go all the way to a 360 degree shutter, because there is some minimum readout time, but does it get close?

 

[Brook Willard]

If memory serves, a 1/24 shutter is possible. I feel like I've selected that option before.

 

[Frank Mirbach]

Looks great ! Let us have more !

 

[LighthouseMEdia]

Okay I can't figure out this low light stuff there seems to be a great disparity that I am seeing between cameras. The low light stuff showcased in Chicago was pretty bad when pushed to even 500ASA it had loads of grain about on kill with the viper and exhibited some REAL BAD NOISE in the blue channel. I'm having a hard time rationalizing the difference in performance I'm seeing. I have seen some clean footage and some REALLY BAD grainy footage. Ideas???

 

[Mark L. Pederson]

Okay I can't figure out this low light stuff there seems to be a great disparity that I am seeing between cameras. The low light stuff showcased in Chicago was pretty bad when pushed to even 500ASA it had loads of grain about on kill with the viper and exhibited some REAL BAD NOISE in the blue channel. I'm having a hard time rationalizing the difference in performance I'm seeing. I have seen some clean footage and some REALLY BAD grainy footage. Ideas???

POST PRODUCTION

 

[LighthouseMEdia]

hmmm this was James Matthers footage, and I was just really very suprised how quickly it developed noise when pushed to 500 let alone 1000 or higher.

 

[grandpa it burns]

Mark...Oh Mark! You are amazing, I think I love you and your beautiful pictures...Keep em coming!!!

 

[Mark L. Pederson]

hmmm this was James Matthers footage, and I was just really very suprised how quickly it developed noise when pushed to 500 let alone 1000 or higher.

do you know exactly how the footage was "processed"?

 

[Evin Grant]

It's really amazing the diffrence between well processed and poorly processed Red images.