Tim Whitcomb
Well-known member
I'm really not. Red needs broader distribution and retailers. Red also needs manufacturing facilities. And, if this whole DSMC concept is still going forward, Red needs still imaging technology to be able to viably compete w/ the other DSLR makers.
Nikon, on the other hand, could sure use a presence in the video and digital cinema world. They are getting their a$$ kicked by Canon in the vDSLR market. And Nikon seems to have little internal knowledge of the cinema world. Nikon could also make a line of digital cinema lenses, instead of everyone using retrofitted or old Nikkors.
Red is not equipped as company to make, sell, market or support a camera for the masses. Now it looks like Red has backed away somewhat from the goal of selling Scarlets to soccer moms. So maybe they can pull off Scarlet in its current incarnation. But if Red wants to go head-to-head in the DSLR market, Red will need help.
Good thing you don't work for RED then. Not only do I disagree, I think you are making some bold and dangerous assumptions here. Look, RED has admitted they have a firmware bug in the flagship camera and the Scarlet is based on its success. The mass manufacturing partner fallout would be an issue regardless of that bug.
Sorry dude, but if I were RED, I would be insulted by your suggestion. Especially as it appears little thought was put into it.