Luca Orlandi
Well-known member
+1
I agree 100%
I agree 100%
Right, but three issues:
1.) Why compare what costs are now to what costs were "back in the day"? That's completely irrelevant - just because an Epic costs less than what an HD broadcast camera used to cost by no means justifies telling someone that they should go out and buy a backup. It makes sense to compare costs and features to what other cameras cost and feature now.
2.) Everyone's finances are different. I was fortunate enough to get by with shooting on the same 5D Mark II from Nov 2008 - Nov 2011 without any issues, and didn't have a backup. Even though that only cost $3k at the time, finances dictated that I couldn't afford a second backup body, and many jobs didn't allow a budget for rental of such. We all take jobs for money, but also accept them because we love the projects and the ideas behind them. Whether it's a huge commercial or a personal film, even if they don't have a budget for a backup body, we should still be able to rely on the camera at hand. $30k for a working package is a lot to ask some people to spend twice for reassurance.
3.) The whole point of this original post was that 3 brand new Epic-MXs bricked. You can look at it as either having 3 Epics and needing 3 backups or, more sensibly, looking at it as having 1 Epic with two backups. When all three fail, and others have been posting issues about their new Epics failing as well, it should raise a concern about the stability of them on a set, regardless of whether you can afford 1 or 100.
The concern being voiced here overall is paying for, arguably, the best quality in the industry and not receiving the best quality control. As you stated, though, Rob: RED is being very good about this. We'd just like to see some official announcement on the issue rather than having mods and reps answer questions on these threads.